Difference between revisions of "July 21, 2006"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ =Lunar Addiction= <div class="post" id="post-432"> <div class="storycontent"> <p>copernicusjuly2006.jpg<br /> <em>image by [...")
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=Lunar Addiction=
 
=Lunar Addiction=
 +
<!-- Start of content -->
 +
<div class="post" id="post-432">
  
+
<div class="storycontent">
<div class="post" id="post-432">
+
<p>[[File:Copernicusjuly2006.jpg|copernicusjuly2006.jpg]]<br />
 
<div class="storycontent">
 
<p>[[File:Copernicusjuly2006.jpg|copernicusjuly2006.jpg]]<br />
 
 
<em>image by [mailto:geoffcmitchell@btinternet.com Geoff Mitchell] </em> </p>
 
<em>image by [mailto:geoffcmitchell@btinternet.com Geoff Mitchell] </em> </p>
 
<p>I promised myself that I wouldn&#8217;t do it again. But like an addict who can&#8217;t stop I have used another image of Copernicus for LPOD. But can you blame me? This is such a classically evocative, even painterly, view of the Moon&#8217;s most imaged feature that I had to do it. Compare this image with the sketch that is the frontispiece of Edmund Neison&#8217;s <i>The Moon</i> (1876) to see what I mean. The reason Geoff&#8217;s image feels like a painting is the smoothness of tone on the rim terraces and the near ejecta. And the swath of brightness of the inner rim is like a visual impression painted on rather than a mere CCD capture of photons. Finally, the rapid fading toward the sunset terminator conveys the drama of a rapidly passing illumination that will soon change. How lucky we are that Geoff was there.</p>
 
<p>I promised myself that I wouldn&#8217;t do it again. But like an addict who can&#8217;t stop I have used another image of Copernicus for LPOD. But can you blame me? This is such a classically evocative, even painterly, view of the Moon&#8217;s most imaged feature that I had to do it. Compare this image with the sketch that is the frontispiece of Edmund Neison&#8217;s <i>The Moon</i> (1876) to see what I mean. The reason Geoff&#8217;s image feels like a painting is the smoothness of tone on the rim terraces and the near ejecta. And the swath of brightness of the inner rim is like a visual impression painted on rather than a mere CCD capture of photons. Finally, the rapid fading toward the sunset terminator conveys the drama of a rapidly passing illumination that will soon change. How lucky we are that Geoff was there.</p>
Line 15: Line 14:
 
Rükl sheet 31<br />
 
Rükl sheet 31<br />
 
[http://www.freewebs.com/geoffmitchell/index.htm Geoff&#8217;s website]</p>
 
[http://www.freewebs.com/geoffmitchell/index.htm Geoff&#8217;s website]</p>
<p align="center">
+
<p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[July 20, 2006|Apollo 11 + 37 Years]] </p>
<i>You can support LPOD when you buy ANY book from Amazon thru [http://www.lpod.org/?page_id=102  LPOD!]</i></p>
+
<p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[July 22, 2006|Swept Away]] </p>
</div>
+
<!-- Removed reference to store page 2 -->
+
</div>
 
+
<!-- End of content -->
----
+
{{wiki/ArticleFooter}}
===COMMENTS?===
 
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.
 

Latest revision as of 23:34, 8 February 2015

Lunar Addiction

copernicusjuly2006.jpg
image by Geoff Mitchell

I promised myself that I wouldn’t do it again. But like an addict who can’t stop I have used another image of Copernicus for LPOD. But can you blame me? This is such a classically evocative, even painterly, view of the Moon’s most imaged feature that I had to do it. Compare this image with the sketch that is the frontispiece of Edmund Neison’s The Moon (1876) to see what I mean. The reason Geoff’s image feels like a painting is the smoothness of tone on the rim terraces and the near ejecta. And the swath of brightness of the inner rim is like a visual impression painted on rather than a mere CCD capture of photons. Finally, the rapid fading toward the sunset terminator conveys the drama of a rapidly passing illumination that will soon change. How lucky we are that Geoff was there.

Chuck Wood

Technical Details:
19 July 206. 9.75″ f/6.3 newtonian + Atik 1 HS11 + x3 barlow + IR filter; 90/1000 frames

Related Links:
Rükl sheet 31
Geoff’s website

Yesterday's LPOD: Apollo 11 + 37 Years

Tomorrow's LPOD: Swept Away


COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.