Difference between revisions of "November 2, 2004"
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=Offset Moon= | =Offset Moon= | ||
| + | <!-- Start of content --> | ||
<table width="85%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> | <table width="85%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<table width="85%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> | <table width="85%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> | ||
<tr><td colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center"> | <tr><td colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center"> | ||
| − | + | [[File:LPOD-2004-11-02.jpeg|LPOD-2004-11-02.jpeg]] | |
</div></td> | </div></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<table width="80%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> | <table width="80%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> | ||
| − | <tr><td><div align="center" class="main_sm">Image Credit: [mailto:pete.lawrence@pbl33.co.uk Pete Lawrence]</p> | + | <tr><td><div align="center" class="main_sm"><p>Image Credit: [mailto:pete.lawrence@pbl33.co.uk Pete Lawrence]</p> |
</div></td> | </div></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<p align="center"><b>Offset Moon</b></p> | <p align="center"><b>Offset Moon</b></p> | ||
<p align="left">Determination of the distances to the stars and galaxies beyond our own is one of the greatest intellectual triumphs of humanity. Measuring parallax - the movement of a nearby star relative to distant stars - is the foundation of all our knowledge of the size of the universe. But the distance to even the nearest stars is so great that the discovery of stellar parallax was not accomplished until 1838. However, the parallactic offset of a nearby astronomical object like the Moon is much easier to demonstrate. In this composite of two images of the eclipsed Moon, taken simultaneously by Pete Lawrence in England and by Pete Cleary, 5220 km away in Montreal, Canada, shows that the Moon shifted about 1.3 times its diameter or about 40 seconds of arc. These data yield a distance to the Moon of 453,168 km - considerably beyond the correct value of about 384,000 km. Actually this experiment has been done before, by the ancient Greek astronomer Hipparchus, whose error was only 36,000 km - twice as good as my estimate!</p> | <p align="left">Determination of the distances to the stars and galaxies beyond our own is one of the greatest intellectual triumphs of humanity. Measuring parallax - the movement of a nearby star relative to distant stars - is the foundation of all our knowledge of the size of the universe. But the distance to even the nearest stars is so great that the discovery of stellar parallax was not accomplished until 1838. However, the parallactic offset of a nearby astronomical object like the Moon is much easier to demonstrate. In this composite of two images of the eclipsed Moon, taken simultaneously by Pete Lawrence in England and by Pete Cleary, 5220 km away in Montreal, Canada, shows that the Moon shifted about 1.3 times its diameter or about 40 seconds of arc. These data yield a distance to the Moon of 453,168 km - considerably beyond the correct value of about 384,000 km. Actually this experiment has been done before, by the ancient Greek astronomer Hipparchus, whose error was only 36,000 km - twice as good as my estimate!</p> | ||
| − | <blockquote><p align="right">— [mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</blockquote> | + | <blockquote> |
| − | <p align="left" | + | <p align="right">— [mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</p></blockquote> |
| − | [ | + | <p align="left"><b>Related Links:</b><br> |
| + | [http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/2004-09/MMVS.jpg Pete's DigitalSky page] | ||
<br>[http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Hipparchus.htm Hipparchus of Rhodes] | <br>[http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Hipparchus.htm Hipparchus of Rhodes] | ||
| − | <p | + | </p> |
| + | <p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[November 1, 2004|Eclipse Necklace]] </p> | ||
| + | <p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[November 3, 2004|Looking Down the Chain]] </p> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 39: | ||
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author & Editor:</b><br> | <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author & Editor:</b><br> | ||
[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Charles A. Wood]</p> | [mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Charles A. Wood]</p> | ||
| − | < | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> |
| − | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | |
| − | < | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> |
| − | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | |
| − | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | |
| − | < | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> |
| − | < | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> |
| − | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | |
| − | < | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> |
| − | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | |
</td></tr> | </td></tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
| − | ---- | + | <!-- End of content --> |
| − | + | {{wiki/ArticleFooter}} | |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 15:03, 15 March 2015
Offset Moon
|
Image Credit: Pete Lawrence |
|
Offset Moon Determination of the distances to the stars and galaxies beyond our own is one of the greatest intellectual triumphs of humanity. Measuring parallax - the movement of a nearby star relative to distant stars - is the foundation of all our knowledge of the size of the universe. But the distance to even the nearest stars is so great that the discovery of stellar parallax was not accomplished until 1838. However, the parallactic offset of a nearby astronomical object like the Moon is much easier to demonstrate. In this composite of two images of the eclipsed Moon, taken simultaneously by Pete Lawrence in England and by Pete Cleary, 5220 km away in Montreal, Canada, shows that the Moon shifted about 1.3 times its diameter or about 40 seconds of arc. These data yield a distance to the Moon of 453,168 km - considerably beyond the correct value of about 384,000 km. Actually this experiment has been done before, by the ancient Greek astronomer Hipparchus, whose error was only 36,000 km - twice as good as my estimate! Related Links: Yesterday's LPOD: Eclipse Necklace Tomorrow's LPOD: Looking Down the Chain |
|
Author & Editor: |
COMMENTS?
Register, Log in, and join in the comments.
