Difference between revisions of "March 8, 2006"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ =Two To One= <div class="post" id="post-132"> <div class="storycontent"> <p>Crescent and earthlight<br /> <em>image by [mailto:pete.l...")
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
=Two To One=
+
=Two to One=
 +
<!-- Start of content -->
 +
<div class="post" id="post-132">
  
+
<div class="storycontent">
<div class="post" id="post-132">
+
<p>[[File:LPOD-Mar8.jpg|Crescent and earthlight]]<br />
 
<div class="storycontent">
 
<p>[[File:LPOD-Mar8.jpg|Crescent and earthlight]]<br />
 
 
<em>image by [mailto:pete.lawrence@digitalsky.org.uk  Pete Lawrence]</em></p>
 
<em>image by [mailto:pete.lawrence@digitalsky.org.uk  Pete Lawrence]</em></p>
 
<p>Pete Lawrence writes: <i>I&#8217;ve been trying to get a good shot of the crescent Moon showing Earthshine for ages but have always failed due to the extreme dynamic range required - something the human eye manages exquisitely of course. The problem is that a shot correctly exposed to show the Earthshine will overexpose the crescent. This causes the terminator to expand into the dark half of the Moon. Matching a crescent shot to an Earthshine shot is therefore very difficult indeed. However, if you take the shots a few days apart - i.e. Earthshine on one day and Crescent a couple of days later, you have a bit of overlap to play with and can finally merge the two images together to create a composite that almost resembles what you can see visually through a small telescope. Well, it works for me!</i></p>
 
<p>Pete Lawrence writes: <i>I&#8217;ve been trying to get a good shot of the crescent Moon showing Earthshine for ages but have always failed due to the extreme dynamic range required - something the human eye manages exquisitely of course. The problem is that a shot correctly exposed to show the Earthshine will overexpose the crescent. This causes the terminator to expand into the dark half of the Moon. Matching a crescent shot to an Earthshine shot is therefore very difficult indeed. However, if you take the shots a few days apart - i.e. Earthshine on one day and Crescent a couple of days later, you have a bit of overlap to play with and can finally merge the two images together to create a composite that almost resembles what you can see visually through a small telescope. Well, it works for me!</i></p>
Line 12: Line 11:
 
<p><strong>Technical Details:</strong><br />
 
<p><strong>Technical Details:</strong><br />
 
March 1 (left) and 4 (middle), 2006. Skywatcher 80ED Pro + Meade 0.63x focal reducer. Camera - Canon 20Da DSLR. Exposures - Earthshine 1/2s @ ISO1600, Crescent 1/1600s @ ISO800. Camera sensitivity was kept high as the telescope was undriven, mounted on a standard photographer&#8217;s tripod. The star to the right of the Moon is TYC2-1641-1, a mag +6.2 star in Pisces. CAW note: You might have to tip your monitor to see the right image properly illuminated - I do.</p>
 
March 1 (left) and 4 (middle), 2006. Skywatcher 80ED Pro + Meade 0.63x focal reducer. Camera - Canon 20Da DSLR. Exposures - Earthshine 1/2s @ ISO1600, Crescent 1/1600s @ ISO800. Camera sensitivity was kept high as the telescope was undriven, mounted on a standard photographer&#8217;s tripod. The star to the right of the Moon is TYC2-1641-1, a mag +6.2 star in Pisces. CAW note: You might have to tip your monitor to see the right image properly illuminated - I do.</p>
<p align="center"><b>SUPPORT LPOD - VISIT A SPONSOR (CLICK AN AD BELOW)!</b></p>
+
<p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[March 7, 2006|On the Limb Again]] </p>
</div>
+
<p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[March 9, 2006|Unbelievable Image]] </p>
+
<!-- Remove click bait -->
 
+
</div>
----
+
<!-- End of content -->
===COMMENTS?===
+
{{wiki/ArticleFooter}}
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.
 

Latest revision as of 12:03, 22 March 2015

Two to One

Crescent and earthlight
image by Pete Lawrence

Pete Lawrence writes: I’ve been trying to get a good shot of the crescent Moon showing Earthshine for ages but have always failed due to the extreme dynamic range required - something the human eye manages exquisitely of course. The problem is that a shot correctly exposed to show the Earthshine will overexpose the crescent. This causes the terminator to expand into the dark half of the Moon. Matching a crescent shot to an Earthshine shot is therefore very difficult indeed. However, if you take the shots a few days apart - i.e. Earthshine on one day and Crescent a couple of days later, you have a bit of overlap to play with and can finally merge the two images together to create a composite that almost resembles what you can see visually through a small telescope. Well, it works for me!

Chuck Wood

Technical Details:
March 1 (left) and 4 (middle), 2006. Skywatcher 80ED Pro + Meade 0.63x focal reducer. Camera - Canon 20Da DSLR. Exposures - Earthshine 1/2s @ ISO1600, Crescent 1/1600s @ ISO800. Camera sensitivity was kept high as the telescope was undriven, mounted on a standard photographer’s tripod. The star to the right of the Moon is TYC2-1641-1, a mag +6.2 star in Pisces. CAW note: You might have to tip your monitor to see the right image properly illuminated - I do.

Yesterday's LPOD: On the Limb Again

Tomorrow's LPOD: Unbelievable Image


COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.