Difference between revisions of "March 4, 2006"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ =Twin Peaks= <div class="post" id="post-124"> <div class="storycontent"> <p>Philolaus-Peach<em>image by [mailto:dpeach_78@yahoo....")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=Twin Peaks=
 
=Twin Peaks=
 +
<div class="post" id="post-124">
  
+
<div class="storycontent">
<div class="post" id="post-124">
+
<p>[[File:Philolaus_LPOD.jpg|Philolaus-Peach]]<em>image by [mailto:dpeach_78@yahoo.co.uk Damian Peach]</em></p>
 
<div class="storycontent">
 
<p>[[File:Philolaus_LPOD.jpg|Philolaus-Peach]]<em>image by [mailto:dpeach_78@yahoo.co.uk Damian Peach]</em></p>
 
 
<p>Do you know of another crater with twin peaks? Central peaks are formed by the rebound of ground zero from the compression of the impact and thus most peaks are single or grouped into a cluster. I wonder what the special circumstances were that caused Philolaus to have two clearly separated peaks. Were there two closely spaced projectiles impacting side by side?  Damian’s image shows other interesting characteristics in this 71 km wide north polar region crater. And to make it easier to see inside the crater I have used Photoshop to remove foreshortening. Most of the floor is hilly but a smooth patch of impact melt is on the north side. The Lunar Orbiter IV image shows that more melt pockets are slopped on to the tops of wall terraces. Concentration of melt on one side of a crater often occurs when the impact is oblique – perhaps that has something to do with the twin peaks. But maybe not – look at the nearby crater [http://www.lpod.org/coppermine/displayimage.php?album=3&#038;pos=3 Carpenter] – it also has twin peaks… Oh, and another twin peak crater? Click [http://www.lpod.org/coppermine/displayimage.php?album=3&#038;pos=16 here!]</p>
 
<p>Do you know of another crater with twin peaks? Central peaks are formed by the rebound of ground zero from the compression of the impact and thus most peaks are single or grouped into a cluster. I wonder what the special circumstances were that caused Philolaus to have two clearly separated peaks. Were there two closely spaced projectiles impacting side by side?  Damian’s image shows other interesting characteristics in this 71 km wide north polar region crater. And to make it easier to see inside the crater I have used Photoshop to remove foreshortening. Most of the floor is hilly but a smooth patch of impact melt is on the north side. The Lunar Orbiter IV image shows that more melt pockets are slopped on to the tops of wall terraces. Concentration of melt on one side of a crater often occurs when the impact is oblique – perhaps that has something to do with the twin peaks. But maybe not – look at the nearby crater [http://www.lpod.org/coppermine/displayimage.php?album=3&#038;pos=3 Carpenter] – it also has twin peaks… Oh, and another twin peak crater? Click [http://www.lpod.org/coppermine/displayimage.php?album=3&#038;pos=16 here!]</p>
 
<p>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</p>
 
<p>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</p>
Line 15: Line 13:
 
[http://www.damianpeach.com/lunar.htm Damian&#8217;s website]</p>
 
[http://www.damianpeach.com/lunar.htm Damian&#8217;s website]</p>
 
<p align="center"><b>REALLY SUPPORT LPOD - VISIT A SPONSOR (CLICK AN AD BELOW)!</b></p>
 
<p align="center"><b>REALLY SUPPORT LPOD - VISIT A SPONSOR (CLICK AN AD BELOW)!</b></p>
</div>
+
</div>
 
 
 
 
----
 
----
 
===COMMENTS?===  
 
===COMMENTS?===  
 
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.
 
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.

Revision as of 18:35, 4 January 2015

Twin Peaks

Philolaus-Peachimage by Damian Peach

Do you know of another crater with twin peaks? Central peaks are formed by the rebound of ground zero from the compression of the impact and thus most peaks are single or grouped into a cluster. I wonder what the special circumstances were that caused Philolaus to have two clearly separated peaks. Were there two closely spaced projectiles impacting side by side? Damian’s image shows other interesting characteristics in this 71 km wide north polar region crater. And to make it easier to see inside the crater I have used Photoshop to remove foreshortening. Most of the floor is hilly but a smooth patch of impact melt is on the north side. The Lunar Orbiter IV image shows that more melt pockets are slopped on to the tops of wall terraces. Concentration of melt on one side of a crater often occurs when the impact is oblique – perhaps that has something to do with the twin peaks. But maybe not – look at the nearby crater Carpenter – it also has twin peaks… Oh, and another twin peak crater? Click here!

Chuck Wood

Technical Details:
9.25″ Schmidt Cassegrain. Lumenera LU075M CCD camera.
Related Links:
Rükl chart 3
Damian’s website

REALLY SUPPORT LPOD - VISIT A SPONSOR (CLICK AN AD BELOW)!


COMMENTS?

Click on this icon File:PostIcon.jpg at the upper right to post a comment.