Difference between revisions of "March 14, 2006"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ =Lunar Rivers= <div class="post" id="post-146"> <div class="storycontent"> <p>Prinz rilles - Daversin<br /> <em>im...")
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=Lunar Rivers=
 
=Lunar Rivers=
 +
<!-- Start of content -->
 +
<div class="post" id="post-146">
  
+
<div class="storycontent">
<div class="post" id="post-146">
+
<p>[[File:Aristarque_prinz060209_21h46.jpg|Prinz rilles - Daversin]]<br />
 
<div class="storycontent">
 
<p>[[File:Aristarque_prinz060209_21h46.jpg|Prinz rilles - Daversin]]<br />
 
 
<em>image by [mailto:bruno.daversin@lahague.com Bruno Daversin]</em></p>
 
<em>image by [mailto:bruno.daversin@lahague.com Bruno Daversin]</em></p>
 
<p>About 170 years ago the magisterial book by Beer and Madler marshaled compelling evidence that the Moon was airless and waterless. But for nearly another hundred years various observers harbored hope that a tenuous atmosphere existed, perhaps on the far side, and if so some features of the Moon might have been related to flowing water. The most extreme view (still promoted by a handful in the early 1960s) was that the maria were dried up ocean beds, and at least one person proposed that craters were coral reefs. With suggestions like these it was easy to interpret sinuous rilles as actual river valleys. A prime example, mentioned by Harvard Observatory scientist William Pickering in the early 20th century, was the family of sinuous rilles near the ruined crater Prinz. These rilles are typically difficult to observe and image, but the facts that they appear to flow downhill and even have tributaries, gives a basis for the river interpretation. But river water is not the only material that flows in channels. Although it wasn’t really appreciated until the 1960s, lavas also flow in channels, have sinuous traces, and merge as tributaries. The lava channel interpretation is now considered correct and similar channels have been discovered in the lava plains of Mars and Venus. Oh, have I said that these new images by Bruno are the best telescopic views I’ve ever seen of these Prinz rilles? And notice the delicate rille just east of Aristarchus - I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve ever noticed that before - have you?</p>
 
<p>About 170 years ago the magisterial book by Beer and Madler marshaled compelling evidence that the Moon was airless and waterless. But for nearly another hundred years various observers harbored hope that a tenuous atmosphere existed, perhaps on the far side, and if so some features of the Moon might have been related to flowing water. The most extreme view (still promoted by a handful in the early 1960s) was that the maria were dried up ocean beds, and at least one person proposed that craters were coral reefs. With suggestions like these it was easy to interpret sinuous rilles as actual river valleys. A prime example, mentioned by Harvard Observatory scientist William Pickering in the early 20th century, was the family of sinuous rilles near the ruined crater Prinz. These rilles are typically difficult to observe and image, but the facts that they appear to flow downhill and even have tributaries, gives a basis for the river interpretation. But river water is not the only material that flows in channels. Although it wasn’t really appreciated until the 1960s, lavas also flow in channels, have sinuous traces, and merge as tributaries. The lava channel interpretation is now considered correct and similar channels have been discovered in the lava plains of Mars and Venus. Oh, have I said that these new images by Bruno are the best telescopic views I’ve ever seen of these Prinz rilles? And notice the delicate rille just east of Aristarchus - I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve ever noticed that before - have you?</p>
Line 15: Line 14:
 
Rükl charts: I don’t have my Rukl with me in Texas so don’t know the chart numbers!<br />
 
Rükl charts: I don’t have my Rukl with me in Texas so don’t know the chart numbers!<br />
 
[http://www.ludiver.com/conquerir_espace_scientifique_lune.php  Ludiver’s Moon photos]</p>
 
[http://www.ludiver.com/conquerir_espace_scientifique_lune.php  Ludiver’s Moon photos]</p>
<p align="center"><b>SUPPORT LPOD - VISIT A SPONSOR (CLICK AN AD BELOW)!</b></p>
+
<p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[March 13, 2006|Amazing Pan]] </p>
</div>
+
<p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[March 15, 2006|Almost Nothing]] </p>
+
<!-- Remove click bait -->
 
+
</div>
----
+
<!-- End of content -->
===COMMENTS?===
+
{{wiki/ArticleFooter}}
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.
 

Latest revision as of 20:27, 7 February 2015

Lunar Rivers

Prinz rilles - Daversin
image by Bruno Daversin

About 170 years ago the magisterial book by Beer and Madler marshaled compelling evidence that the Moon was airless and waterless. But for nearly another hundred years various observers harbored hope that a tenuous atmosphere existed, perhaps on the far side, and if so some features of the Moon might have been related to flowing water. The most extreme view (still promoted by a handful in the early 1960s) was that the maria were dried up ocean beds, and at least one person proposed that craters were coral reefs. With suggestions like these it was easy to interpret sinuous rilles as actual river valleys. A prime example, mentioned by Harvard Observatory scientist William Pickering in the early 20th century, was the family of sinuous rilles near the ruined crater Prinz. These rilles are typically difficult to observe and image, but the facts that they appear to flow downhill and even have tributaries, gives a basis for the river interpretation. But river water is not the only material that flows in channels. Although it wasn’t really appreciated until the 1960s, lavas also flow in channels, have sinuous traces, and merge as tributaries. The lava channel interpretation is now considered correct and similar channels have been discovered in the lava plains of Mars and Venus. Oh, have I said that these new images by Bruno are the best telescopic views I’ve ever seen of these Prinz rilles? And notice the delicate rille just east of Aristarchus - I’m not sure I’ve ever noticed that before - have you?

Chuck Wood

Technical Details:
Feb 9, 2006. Ludiver Observatory 600 mm (24″) Schmidt-Cassegrain + webcam + IR filter.
Related Links:
Rükl charts: I don’t have my Rukl with me in Texas so don’t know the chart numbers!
Ludiver’s Moon photos

Yesterday's LPOD: Amazing Pan

Tomorrow's LPOD: Almost Nothing


COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.