Difference between revisions of "June 3, 2011"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Jun3-11.jpg/233955722/LPOD-Jun3-11.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Jun3-11.jpg|LPOD-Jun3-11.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br />
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Jun3-11.jpg/233955722/LPOD-Jun3-11.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Jun3-11.jpg|LPOD-Jun3-11.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br />
<em>image by [mailto:mauricejscollins@hotmail.com" rel="nofollow Maurice Collins]</em><br />
+
<em>image by [mailto:mauricejscollins@hotmail.com Maurice Collins]</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
Maurice, our intrepid lunar imaging explorer, is apparently one of the few to try out the new [http://pub.lmmp.nasa.gov/LMMPUI/LMMP_CLIENT/LMMP.html" rel="nofollow Iliads] software mentioned in the LPOD of [/May+16%2C+2011 May 16]. The monthful <em>Integrated Lunar Information Architecture for Decision Support</em> downloadable program allows combining of various data sets - here, Maurice used the LRO slope map and the USGS geology map as background with a few Kaguya images draped here and there, and a topographic cross-section passing across Plato. The top image shows a transect running approximately NE to SW, revealing a flat floor for Plato, which is significantly higher than nearby Mare Imbrium. The lower image is more surprising for it displays a significant down slope of Plato's floor from east to west. There doesn't seem to be a scale bar for the altimeter trace but estimating from the altitude of Plato's east rim above its floor (~2.5 km), the western side of Plato's floor is about 200 m lower than the east side. Is that true? Possibly, but some of the other topography here looks questionable, especially the unimposing [http://www.lpod.org/?m=20070107" rel="nofollow hillock] to the west that maps as a towering spire on the altimetry. We all need to look closely at Iliads to understand any limitations or errors in the software or data. It looks like it can be a very good analysis tool, once it is better understood.<br />
+
Maurice, our intrepid lunar imaging explorer, is apparently one of the few to try out the new [http://pub.lmmp.nasa.gov/LMMPUI/LMMP_CLIENT/LMMP.html Iliads] software mentioned in the LPOD of [/May+16%2C+2011 May 16]. The monthful <em>Integrated Lunar Information Architecture for Decision Support</em> downloadable program allows combining of various data sets - here, Maurice used the LRO slope map and the USGS geology map as background with a few Kaguya images draped here and there, and a topographic cross-section passing across Plato. The top image shows a transect running approximately NE to SW, revealing a flat floor for Plato, which is significantly higher than nearby Mare Imbrium. The lower image is more surprising for it displays a significant down slope of Plato's floor from east to west. There doesn't seem to be a scale bar for the altimeter trace but estimating from the altitude of Plato's east rim above its floor (~2.5 km), the western side of Plato's floor is about 200 m lower than the east side. Is that true? Possibly, but some of the other topography here looks questionable, especially the unimposing [http://www.lpod.org/?m=20070107 hillock] to the west that maps as a towering spire on the altimetry. We all need to look closely at Iliads to understand any limitations or errors in the software or data. It looks like it can be a very good analysis tool, once it is better understood.<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow Chuck Wood]</em><br />
+
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<strong>Related Links</strong><br />
 
<strong>Related Links</strong><br />

Revision as of 17:35, 11 January 2015

Ups And Downs but Are They Sound?

LPOD-Jun3-11.jpg
image by Maurice Collins

Maurice, our intrepid lunar imaging explorer, is apparently one of the few to try out the new Iliads software mentioned in the LPOD of [/May+16%2C+2011 May 16]. The monthful Integrated Lunar Information Architecture for Decision Support downloadable program allows combining of various data sets - here, Maurice used the LRO slope map and the USGS geology map as background with a few Kaguya images draped here and there, and a topographic cross-section passing across Plato. The top image shows a transect running approximately NE to SW, revealing a flat floor for Plato, which is significantly higher than nearby Mare Imbrium. The lower image is more surprising for it displays a significant down slope of Plato's floor from east to west. There doesn't seem to be a scale bar for the altimeter trace but estimating from the altitude of Plato's east rim above its floor (~2.5 km), the western side of Plato's floor is about 200 m lower than the east side. Is that true? Possibly, but some of the other topography here looks questionable, especially the unimposing hillock to the west that maps as a towering spire on the altimetry. We all need to look closely at Iliads to understand any limitations or errors in the software or data. It looks like it can be a very good analysis tool, once it is better understood.

Chuck Wood

Related Links
Rükl plate 3