Difference between revisions of "July 29, 2010"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:1:<h1> --> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:1:<h1> --> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-July29-10.jpg/154432091/LPOD-July29-10.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-July29-10.jpg|LPOD-July29-10.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16 --><br /> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-July29-10.jpg/154432091/LPOD-July29-10.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-July29-10.jpg|LPOD-July29-10.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16 --><br /> | ||
| − | <em>image from [http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/index.php?/archives/261-Not-your-average-complex-crater.html#extended | + | <em>image from [http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/index.php?/archives/261-Not-your-average-complex-crater.html#extended LRO Featured Image Gallery] [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University]</em><br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Fifty years ago this image would be cited as irrefutable evidence that lunar craters were volcanic in origin. Of course, such high resolution closeups as this LRO Narrow Angle Camera view of part of the rim of Bürg crater were not available then, and the understanding of rim dynamics was also missing. The line of small craters along the left margin of the illuminated area - and their nearly complete absence across the rest of the image is such a non-random distribution that could only occur if a fracture, such as occurs along a volcanic rim, allowed magma to escape, forming a series of volcanic pits along the rim crest. The bright right part of the image is the relatively steep slope of the crater wall from the rim (left) towards the crater floor (out of sight to the right). Unfortunately for the volcano theory, all of the craters along the ridge crest are impact craters - the fact that they are not random in occurrence is a result of the rapid destruction of nearly all of the impact craters that formed on the wall slope (notice the convoluted patterns of downslope movement?), and the preservation of the ones that happened to form along the relatively flat rim crest. This is a case of differential preservation rather than non-random formation.<br /> | Fifty years ago this image would be cited as irrefutable evidence that lunar craters were volcanic in origin. Of course, such high resolution closeups as this LRO Narrow Angle Camera view of part of the rim of Bürg crater were not available then, and the understanding of rim dynamics was also missing. The line of small craters along the left margin of the illuminated area - and their nearly complete absence across the rest of the image is such a non-random distribution that could only occur if a fracture, such as occurs along a volcanic rim, allowed magma to escape, forming a series of volcanic pits along the rim crest. The bright right part of the image is the relatively steep slope of the crater wall from the rim (left) towards the crater floor (out of sight to the right). Unfortunately for the volcano theory, all of the craters along the ridge crest are impact craters - the fact that they are not random in occurrence is a result of the rapid destruction of nearly all of the impact craters that formed on the wall slope (notice the convoluted patterns of downslope movement?), and the preservation of the ones that happened to form along the relatively flat rim crest. This is a case of differential preservation rather than non-random formation.<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| − | <em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com | + | <em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | <strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | ||
Rükl plate [http://the-moon.wikispaces.com/R%C3%BCkl+14 14]<br /> | Rükl plate [http://the-moon.wikispaces.com/R%C3%BCkl+14 14]<br /> | ||
<hr /> | <hr /> | ||
| − | <div>You can support LPOD when you buy any book from Amazon thru [http://www.lpod.org/?page_id=591 | + | <div>You can support LPOD when you buy any book from Amazon thru [http://www.lpod.org/?page_id=591 LPOD!]<br /> |
</div> | </div> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
===COMMENTS?=== | ===COMMENTS?=== | ||
| − | + | Register, and click on the <b>Discussion</b> tab at the top of the page. | |
Revision as of 17:22, 11 January 2015
Non-Random
image from LRO Featured Image Gallery [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University]
Fifty years ago this image would be cited as irrefutable evidence that lunar craters were volcanic in origin. Of course, such high resolution closeups as this LRO Narrow Angle Camera view of part of the rim of Bürg crater were not available then, and the understanding of rim dynamics was also missing. The line of small craters along the left margin of the illuminated area - and their nearly complete absence across the rest of the image is such a non-random distribution that could only occur if a fracture, such as occurs along a volcanic rim, allowed magma to escape, forming a series of volcanic pits along the rim crest. The bright right part of the image is the relatively steep slope of the crater wall from the rim (left) towards the crater floor (out of sight to the right). Unfortunately for the volcano theory, all of the craters along the ridge crest are impact craters - the fact that they are not random in occurrence is a result of the rapid destruction of nearly all of the impact craters that formed on the wall slope (notice the convoluted patterns of downslope movement?), and the preservation of the ones that happened to form along the relatively flat rim crest. This is a case of differential preservation rather than non-random formation.
Chuck Wood
Related Links
Rükl plate 14
COMMENTS?
Register, and click on the Discussion tab at the top of the page.
