Difference between revisions of "July 24, 2008"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<em>image by [mailto:paolo@lazzarotti-optics.com Paolo R. Lazzarotti], Massa, Italy.  This LPOD originally appeared [http://www.lpod.org/?m=200604 April 30, 2006.]</em><br />
 
<em>image by [mailto:paolo@lazzarotti-optics.com Paolo R. Lazzarotti], Massa, Italy.  This LPOD originally appeared [http://www.lpod.org/?m=200604 April 30, 2006.]</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
Hansteen (top) and Billy (lower) are the same diameter (45 km) and have very similar narrow inner walls. But the similarity stops there. Billy has a lava-covered floor (making it a dark spot at full Moon) and only a few small slump masses around the edges of its floor. Hansteen has broad piles of debris that fill the southern half of its floor, and slump blocks have slid down its northwestern wall. On Lunar Orbiter IV [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunar_orbiter/images/img/iv_149_h2.jpg images] it appears that there may be some concentric fratures in Hansteen, making it a floor-fractured crater. The northern rrim of the crater has a strange triangular extension northward where a pile of debris has slid toward the floor. Why do two craters that were probably near twins at birth evolve along such different tracks? There are other interesting things to observe here including the [http://www.lpod.org/archive/2004/03/LPOD-2004-03-02.htm Arrowhead], a possible dome on the mare to the right-center, and the bubbly-terrain of the bottom-left. And another feature needing interpretive clarification is the faint, bright and slightly squiggly line that goes from the Arrowhead to the top of the image. Rükl shows it as a mare ridge, the Lunar Orbiter IV image doesn’t show it, and it looks like it could actually be a delicate sinuous rille. Hmm?<br />
+
Hansteen (top) and Billy (lower) are the same diameter (45 km) and have very similar narrow inner walls. But the similarity stops there. Billy has a lava-covered floor (making it a dark spot at full Moon) and only a few small slump masses around the edges of its floor. Hansteen has broad piles of debris that fill the southern half of its floor, and slump blocks have slid down its northwestern wall. On Lunar Orbiter IV [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunar_orbiter/images/img/iv_149_h2.jpg images] it appears that there may be some concentric fratures in Hansteen, making it a floor-fractured crater. The northern rrim of the crater has a strange triangular extension northward where a pile of debris has slid toward the floor. Why do two craters that were probably near twins at birth evolve along such different tracks? There are other interesting things to observe here including the [[March_2,_2004|Arrowhead]], a possible dome on the mare to the right-center, and the bubbly-terrain of the bottom-left. And another feature needing interpretive clarification is the faint, bright and slightly squiggly line that goes from the Arrowhead to the top of the image. Rükl shows it as a mare ridge, the Lunar Orbiter IV image doesn’t show it, and it looks like it could actually be a delicate sinuous rille. Hmm?<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br />
 
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br />

Latest revision as of 22:20, 22 March 2015

Deviant Tracks

LPOD-JULY24-08.jpg
image by Paolo R. Lazzarotti, Massa, Italy. This LPOD originally appeared April 30, 2006.

Hansteen (top) and Billy (lower) are the same diameter (45 km) and have very similar narrow inner walls. But the similarity stops there. Billy has a lava-covered floor (making it a dark spot at full Moon) and only a few small slump masses around the edges of its floor. Hansteen has broad piles of debris that fill the southern half of its floor, and slump blocks have slid down its northwestern wall. On Lunar Orbiter IV images it appears that there may be some concentric fratures in Hansteen, making it a floor-fractured crater. The northern rrim of the crater has a strange triangular extension northward where a pile of debris has slid toward the floor. Why do two craters that were probably near twins at birth evolve along such different tracks? There are other interesting things to observe here including the Arrowhead, a possible dome on the mare to the right-center, and the bubbly-terrain of the bottom-left. And another feature needing interpretive clarification is the faint, bright and slightly squiggly line that goes from the Arrowhead to the top of the image. Rükl shows it as a mare ridge, the Lunar Orbiter IV image doesn’t show it, and it looks like it could actually be a delicate sinuous rille. Hmm?

Chuck Wood

Technical Details
11 January 2006, 315 mm Dall-Kirkham Spada telescope (f/25), Lumenera Infinity 2-1M camera, Edmund Optics G filter IR blocked, 160 frames stack out of 2500.

Related Links
Rükl plate 40
Paolo's website

Yesterday's LPOD: Straight Talk

Tomorrow's LPOD: Extreme Makeover



COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.