Difference between revisions of "January 21, 2014"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Jan21-14.jpg/484126000/LPOD-Jan21-14.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Jan21-14.jpg|LPOD-Jan21-14.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br />
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Jan21-14.jpg/484126000/LPOD-Jan21-14.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Jan21-14.jpg|LPOD-Jan21-14.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br />
<em>image by [mailto:richard@astrofotografie.nl" rel="nofollow Richard Bosman], Enschede, Netherland</em><br />
+
<em>image by [mailto:richard@astrofotografie.nl Richard Bosman], Enschede, Netherland</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
Mersenius has long been [http://www.lpod.org/archive/archive/2004/06/LPOD-2004-06-13.htm" rel="nofollow observed] to have shading and even shadows indicative of an up domed floor. Is it? Following the surprising [http://lpod.wikispaces.com/January+21%2C+2014 revelation] that LRO-derived revealed a major unexpected topographic variation on the floor of Pitatus, it was with some excitement that I made topographic traverses across the floor of Mersenius. North to south and east to west traverses confirm what observers suspected. The entire floor is 600-700 m higher in the center than around the edges. I doubt if the high floor was constructed of lava flows, erupted one on top of the other. The families of rilles - from the center towards the rim and concentric on the western side - are consistent with the floor being uplifted, probably by the injection of magma under the crater after the original flat floor had formed. This is in fact the mechanism Pete Schultz [http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?db_key=AST&amp;bibcode=1976Moon...15..241S&amp;letter=.&amp;classic=YES&amp;defaultprint=YES&amp;whole_paper=YES&amp;page=241&amp;epage=241&amp;send=Send+PDF&amp;filetype=.pdf" rel="nofollow proposed] in 1976 to explain Mersenius and other form floor-fractured craters. The new topo data reinforce the likely correctness of that interpretation. <br />
+
Mersenius has long been [http://www.lpod.org/archive/archive/2004/06/LPOD-2004-06-13.htm observed] to have shading and even shadows indicative of an up domed floor. Is it? Following the surprising [http://lpod.wikispaces.com/January+21%2C+2014 revelation] that LRO-derived revealed a major unexpected topographic variation on the floor of Pitatus, it was with some excitement that I made topographic traverses across the floor of Mersenius. North to south and east to west traverses confirm what observers suspected. The entire floor is 600-700 m higher in the center than around the edges. I doubt if the high floor was constructed of lava flows, erupted one on top of the other. The families of rilles - from the center towards the rim and concentric on the western side - are consistent with the floor being uplifted, probably by the injection of magma under the crater after the original flat floor had formed. This is in fact the mechanism Pete Schultz [http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?db_key=AST&amp;bibcode=1976Moon...15..241S&amp;letter=.&amp;classic=YES&amp;defaultprint=YES&amp;whole_paper=YES&amp;page=241&amp;epage=241&amp;send=Send+PDF&amp;filetype=.pdf proposed] in 1976 to explain Mersenius and other form floor-fractured craters. The new topo data reinforce the likely correctness of that interpretation. <br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow Chuck Wood]<br />
+
[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<strong>Technical Data</strong><br />
 
<strong>Technical Data</strong><br />
Line 14: Line 14:
 
<strong>Related Links</strong><br />
 
<strong>Related Links</strong><br />
 
<em>[http://lpod.wikispaces.com/21st+Century+Atlas+of+the+Moon 21st Century Atlas]</em> chart .26<br />
 
<em>[http://lpod.wikispaces.com/21st+Century+Atlas+of+the+Moon 21st Century Atlas]</em> chart .26<br />
Richard's [http://www.astrofotografie.nl/index.htm" rel="nofollow Astro Fotografie] website<br />
+
Richard's [http://www.astrofotografie.nl/index.htm Astro Fotografie] website<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<hr />
 
<hr />

Revision as of 18:14, 11 January 2015

This Time Topo Confirms What We Believe

LPOD-Jan21-14.jpg
image by Richard Bosman, Enschede, Netherland

Mersenius has long been observed to have shading and even shadows indicative of an up domed floor. Is it? Following the surprising revelation that LRO-derived revealed a major unexpected topographic variation on the floor of Pitatus, it was with some excitement that I made topographic traverses across the floor of Mersenius. North to south and east to west traverses confirm what observers suspected. The entire floor is 600-700 m higher in the center than around the edges. I doubt if the high floor was constructed of lava flows, erupted one on top of the other. The families of rilles - from the center towards the rim and concentric on the western side - are consistent with the floor being uplifted, probably by the injection of magma under the crater after the original flat floor had formed. This is in fact the mechanism Pete Schultz proposed in 1976 to explain Mersenius and other form floor-fractured craters. The new topo data reinforce the likely correctness of that interpretation.

Chuck Wood

Technical Data
C14

Related Links
21st Century Atlas chart .26
Richard's Astro Fotografie website