Difference between revisions of "February 25, 2012"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=Evidence for No Presence=
 
=Evidence for No Presence=
 
+
<!-- Start of content -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Feb25-12.jpg/304956804/LPOD-Feb25-12.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Feb25-12.jpg|LPOD-Feb25-12.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br />
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Feb25-12.jpg/304956804/LPOD-Feb25-12.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Feb25-12.jpg|LPOD-Feb25-12.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br />
 
<em>image by [mailto:c.zannelli@virgilio.it Carmelo Zannelli], Palermo, Italy</em><br />
 
<em>image by [mailto:c.zannelli@virgilio.it Carmelo Zannelli], Palermo, Italy</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
Cassini and the possible small concentric crater behind it show up well in Mel's new image but the relatively bland area south of Cassini has become an area of interest. KC Pau's recent [http://lpod.wikispaces.com/February+22%2C+2012 LPOD] suggested to me that Aristillus - just off this image at bottom left - may have been formed by an oblique impact. KC's view showed well-developed radial ridges and gullies (R &amp; G) to the northwest and to the southeast but not to the intermediate directions such as visible here. Mel's large scale image with a low angle of illumination clearly reveals the lack of R &amp; G terrain, confirming the impression from KC's image. Aristillus was formed by an oblique impact, a fact that seems not to have been noticed before amateur images demonstrated it.<br />
+
Cassini and the possible small concentric crater behind it show up well in Mel's new image but the relatively bland area south of Cassini has become an area of interest. KC Pau's recent [http://www2.lpod.org/wiki/February_22,_2012 LPOD] suggested to me that Aristillus - just off this image at bottom left - may have been formed by an oblique impact. KC's view showed well-developed radial ridges and gullies (R &amp; G) to the northwest and to the southeast but not to the intermediate directions such as visible here. Mel's large scale image with a low angle of illumination clearly reveals the lack of R &amp; G terrain, confirming the impression from KC's image. Aristillus was formed by an oblique impact, a fact that seems not to have been noticed before amateur images demonstrated it.<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br />
 
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br />
Line 14: Line 14:
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<strong>Related Links</strong><br />
 
<strong>Related Links</strong><br />
Rükl plate [http://the-moon.wikispaces.com/R%C3%BCkl+12 12]<br />
+
Rükl plate [https://the-moon.us/wiki/R%C3%BCkl_12 12]<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 +
<p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[February 24, 2012|Angular Questions]] </p>
 +
<p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[February 26, 2012|Three, not in a Row]] </p>
 
<hr />
 
<hr />
 +
{{wiki/ArticleFooter}}

Latest revision as of 08:26, 28 October 2018

Evidence for No Presence

LPOD-Feb25-12.jpg
image by Carmelo Zannelli, Palermo, Italy

Cassini and the possible small concentric crater behind it show up well in Mel's new image but the relatively bland area south of Cassini has become an area of interest. KC Pau's recent LPOD suggested to me that Aristillus - just off this image at bottom left - may have been formed by an oblique impact. KC's view showed well-developed radial ridges and gullies (R & G) to the northwest and to the southeast but not to the intermediate directions such as visible here. Mel's large scale image with a low angle of illumination clearly reveals the lack of R & G terrain, confirming the impression from KC's image. Aristillus was formed by an oblique impact, a fact that seems not to have been noticed before amateur images demonstrated it.

Chuck Wood

Technical Details
Celestron C14 @ F/21 – Baader FFC multiplier – Baader Ir-685nm filter – Basler ACA1300gm camera – Seeing 5-6/10.

Related Links
Rükl plate 12

Yesterday's LPOD: Angular Questions

Tomorrow's LPOD: Three, not in a Row



COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.