Difference between revisions of "February 10, 2010"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=New Views=
 
=New Views=
 
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:1:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:1:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Feb10-10.jpg/119385143/LPOD-Feb10-10.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Feb10-10.jpg|LPOD-Feb10-10.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16 --><br />
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Feb10-10.jpg/119385143/LPOD-Feb10-10.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Feb10-10.jpg|LPOD-Feb10-10.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16 --><br />
<em>images by [mailto:jayem4646@eircom.net John Moore], Ireland</em><br />
+
<em>images by [mailto:jayem4646@eircom.net" rel="nofollow John Moore], Ireland</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
The enclosed image shows (left) a 'Infrared' and (right) a visual' view of the Moon taken 6 Feb 2010, GMT 7.30am. They look similar in ways, however, as the former image was made with simply transforming a normal digital camera into a infrared camera, I wonder would LPODers with more powerful scopes be able to produce much better views in the IR (I used just a 4-1/2&quot; reflector). I'm not sure, however, if any valuable science may be gained from it though.  I'm thinking along lines that as infrared technology may not be 'believed' available, generally, LPOD visitors might want to try this digital conversion with old cameras they have lying around, and do this simple experiment (it might also prove useful with imaging the [http://the-moon.wikispaces.com/LPOD+Jan+31%2C+2008 faintest of moon crescents]. I've put up [http://www.moonposter.ie/infrared.htm a description] on how to make the 'Infrared' conversion. Another experiment that I'd like to investigate more is to view the Moon using the &quot;thermal' cameras (as used on houses to see how insufficiently insulated they are) attached to the scope. They are very expensive and I don't have one, however, perhaps someone (e.g. college students/researchers working in physics and geology departments) might have access to one? I'm not sure how such 'thermal' images might turn out (if an image at all), however, it might be possible to show the varying, temperature changes around certain craters/regions etc., particularly on the terminator regions where heat is dissipating. <br />
+
The enclosed image shows (left) a 'Infrared' and (right) a visual' view of the Moon taken 6 Feb 2010, GMT 7.30am. They look similar in ways, however, as the former image was made with simply transforming a normal digital camera into a infrared camera, I wonder would LPODers with more powerful scopes be able to produce much better views in the IR (I used just a 4-1/2&quot; reflector). I'm not sure, however, if any valuable science may be gained from it though.  I'm thinking along lines that as infrared technology may not be 'believed' available, generally, LPOD visitors might want to try this digital conversion with old cameras they have lying around, and do this simple experiment (it might also prove useful with imaging the [http://the-moon.wikispaces.com/LPOD+Jan+31%2C+2008 faintest of moon crescents]. I've put up [http://www.moonposter.ie/infrared.htm" rel="nofollow a description] on how to make the 'Infrared' conversion. Another experiment that I'd like to investigate more is to view the Moon using the &quot;thermal' cameras (as used on houses to see how insufficiently insulated they are) attached to the scope. They are very expensive and I don't have one, however, perhaps someone (e.g. college students/researchers working in physics and geology departments) might have access to one? I'm not sure how such 'thermal' images might turn out (if an image at all), however, it might be possible to show the varying, temperature changes around certain craters/regions etc., particularly on the terminator regions where heat is dissipating. <br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
[mailto:jayem4646@eircom.net John Moore],<br />
+
[mailto:jayem4646@eircom.net" rel="nofollow John Moore],<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<strong>Technical Details</strong><br />
 
<strong>Technical Details</strong><br />
Line 14: Line 13:
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<strong>Related Links</strong><br />
 
<strong>Related Links</strong><br />
John's Moon Atlas [http://www.moonposter.ie/ website]<br />
+
John's Moon Atlas [http://www.moonposter.ie/" rel="nofollow website]<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<hr />
 
<hr />
<div>You can support LPOD when you buy any book from Amazon thru [http://www.lpod.org/?page_id=591 LPOD!]<br />
+
<div>You can support LPOD when you buy any book from Amazon thru [http://www.lpod.org/?page_id=591" rel="nofollow LPOD!]<br />
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
 
----
 
----
 
===COMMENTS?===  
 
===COMMENTS?===  
 
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.
 
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.

Revision as of 19:19, 4 January 2015

New Views

LPOD-Feb10-10.jpg
images by " rel="nofollow John Moore, Ireland

The enclosed image shows (left) a 'Infrared' and (right) a visual' view of the Moon taken 6 Feb 2010, GMT 7.30am. They look similar in ways, however, as the former image was made with simply transforming a normal digital camera into a infrared camera, I wonder would LPODers with more powerful scopes be able to produce much better views in the IR (I used just a 4-1/2" reflector). I'm not sure, however, if any valuable science may be gained from it though. I'm thinking along lines that as infrared technology may not be 'believed' available, generally, LPOD visitors might want to try this digital conversion with old cameras they have lying around, and do this simple experiment (it might also prove useful with imaging the faintest of moon crescents. I've put up " rel="nofollow a description on how to make the 'Infrared' conversion. Another experiment that I'd like to investigate more is to view the Moon using the "thermal' cameras (as used on houses to see how insufficiently insulated they are) attached to the scope. They are very expensive and I don't have one, however, perhaps someone (e.g. college students/researchers working in physics and geology departments) might have access to one? I'm not sure how such 'thermal' images might turn out (if an image at all), however, it might be possible to show the varying, temperature changes around certain craters/regions etc., particularly on the terminator regions where heat is dissipating.

" rel="nofollow John Moore,

Technical Details
6 February 2010, GMT 7:30am. Digital camera, 4.5" reflecting telescope. (Lat: 51.9N, Long: 8.47W).

Related Links
John's Moon Atlas " rel="nofollow website


You can support LPOD when you buy any book from Amazon thru " rel="nofollow LPOD!

COMMENTS?

Click on this icon File:PostIcon.jpg at the upper right to post a comment.