Difference between revisions of "December 6, 2011"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=A Classic Compared=
 
=A Classic Compared=
 
+
<!-- Start of content -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Dec6-11.jpg/282650326/LPOD-Dec6-11.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Dec6-11.jpg|LPOD-Dec6-11.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br />
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Dec6-11.jpg/282650326/LPOD-Dec6-11.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Dec6-11.jpg|LPOD-Dec6-11.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br />
 
<em>left painting by John Russell (circa 1795) from [http://www.baalunarsection.org.uk/2011-12-lsc.pdf BAA]; right image by [http://lpod.org/coppermine/displayimage.php?pos=-4453 Volker], Germany (50°83´- 13°08´)</em><br />
 
<em>left painting by John Russell (circa 1795) from [http://www.baalunarsection.org.uk/2011-12-lsc.pdf BAA]; right image by [http://lpod.org/coppermine/displayimage.php?pos=-4453 Volker], Germany (50°83´- 13°08´)</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
The December issue of the British Astronomical Association Lunar Section Circular uses this wonderful painting<br />
+
The December issue of the British Astronomical Association Lunar Section Circular uses this wonderful painting
from John Russell to promote a lead article about lunar color. This is perhaps the most accurate drawing of the<br />
+
from John Russell to promote a lead article about lunar color. This is perhaps the most accurate drawing of the
lunar surface ever made. Quite a claim, but Russell was a professional artist and this comparison with a modern<br />
+
lunar surface ever made. Quite a claim, but Russell was a professional artist and this comparison with a modern
high quality image (from the LPOD Photo Gallery) shows how good he was. His tonal depiction of light and dark<br />
+
high quality image (from the LPOD Photo Gallery) shows how good he was. His tonal depiction of light and dark
areas was excellent; no other lunar sketches captured the many subtle tones shown here. He even included<br />
+
areas was excellent; no other lunar sketches captured the many subtle tones shown here. He even included
small albedo details such as the dark halo craters on the floor of Alphonsus and the butterfly rays of Messier. As<br />
+
small albedo details such as the dark halo craters on the floor of Alphonsus and the butterfly rays of Messier. As
is true with many lunar artists Russell exaggerated the size of some features - his Copernicus and Posidonius<br />
+
is true with many lunar artists Russell exaggerated the size of some features - his Copernicus and Posidonius
appear too large and the Alpine Valley is shown wider than it is. Understanding of the Moon might not have<br />
+
appear too large and the Alpine Valley is shown wider than it is. Understanding of the Moon might not have
progressed faster if more artists of Russell's caliber had drawn it, but there would have been less confusion over<br />
+
progressed faster if more artists of Russell's caliber had drawn it, but there would have been less confusion over
possible changes - often due to poor drawings - and we would have many more masterpieces. <br />
+
possible changes - often due to poor drawings - and we would have many more masterpieces.  
 +
<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br />
 
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br />
Line 23: Line 24:
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<hr />
 
<hr />
 +
<p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[December 5, 2011|Peek a Boo]] </p>
 +
<p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[December 7, 2011|Non-Concentric Basin Scarp]] </p>
 +
<!-- End of content -->
 +
{{wiki/ArticleFooter}}

Latest revision as of 16:17, 1 March 2015

A Classic Compared

LPOD-Dec6-11.jpg
left painting by John Russell (circa 1795) from BAA; right image by Volker, Germany (50°83´- 13°08´)

The December issue of the British Astronomical Association Lunar Section Circular uses this wonderful painting from John Russell to promote a lead article about lunar color. This is perhaps the most accurate drawing of the lunar surface ever made. Quite a claim, but Russell was a professional artist and this comparison with a modern high quality image (from the LPOD Photo Gallery) shows how good he was. His tonal depiction of light and dark areas was excellent; no other lunar sketches captured the many subtle tones shown here. He even included small albedo details such as the dark halo craters on the floor of Alphonsus and the butterfly rays of Messier. As is true with many lunar artists Russell exaggerated the size of some features - his Copernicus and Posidonius appear too large and the Alpine Valley is shown wider than it is. Understanding of the Moon might not have progressed faster if more artists of Russell's caliber had drawn it, but there would have been less confusion over possible changes - often due to poor drawings - and we would have many more masterpieces.

Chuck Wood

Technical Details
Volker's image: 23-04-2010. Intes-MN71 (D:178mm F:1080mm); DMK31 and IR-Pass 685nm


Yesterday's LPOD: Peek a Boo

Tomorrow's LPOD: Non-Concentric Basin Scarp


COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.