Difference between revisions of "December 29, 2010"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<em>image by [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2010/pdf/1335.pdf J. Korteniemi et al (2010)]</em><br />
 
<em>image by [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2010/pdf/1335.pdf J. Korteniemi et al (2010)]</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
[http://the-moon.wikispaces.com/Floor+Fractured+Craters Floor-fractured craters] are the most interesting on the Moon. <br />
+
[https://the-moon.us/wiki/Floor_Fractured_Craters Floor-fractured craters] are the most interesting on the Moon. <br />
Well, you might say, what about Copernicus and Tycho - their floors aren't fractured and they are pretty interesting. True, <br />
+
<br />
but I wonder if they have as many different types of things to see as FFC? Consider FFC such as Alphonsus, Posidonius, <br />
+
Well, you might say, what about Copernicus and Tycho - their floors aren't fractured and they are pretty interesting. True,  
Gassendi and Petavius. First, they are relatively large craters with uplifted floors and related concentric fractures. Second, <br />
+
but I wonder if they have as many different types of things to see as FFC? Consider FFC such as Alphonsus, Posidonius,  
these and other FFC often contain various kinds of rilles, concentric craters and dark halo craters. Few FFC are young <br />
+
Gassendi and Petavius. First, they are relatively large craters with uplifted floors and related concentric fractures. Second,  
enough to have rays (exception is Taruntius) because they already existed when mare basalts were being produced, which <br />
+
these and other FFC often contain various kinds of rilles, concentric craters and dark halo craters. Few FFC are young  
mostly ended about 3 to 2.5 b.y. ago. Nearly all FFC are on the margins of maria and the preferred model is that magma rose <br />
+
enough to have rays (exception is Taruntius) because they already existed when mare basalts were being produced, which  
up basin fractures and ponded under the craters, ultimately lifting their floors, and often erupting lavas onto their floors. In <br />
+
mostly ended about 3 to 2.5 b.y. ago. Nearly all FFC are on the margins of maria and the preferred model is that magma rose  
1976 [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976Moon...15..241S Pete Schultz] first brought attention to FFC as a class of modified impact craters and he identified 206 but never <br />
+
up basin fractures and ponded under the craters, ultimately lifting their floors, and often erupting lavas onto their floors. In  
published a comprehensive list of them. This new map, made by summer students interning at the Lunar &amp; Planetary Institute <br />
+
1976 [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976Moon...15..241S Pete Schultz] first brought attention to FFC as a class of modified impact craters and he identified 206 but never  
in Houston, is based on inspection of Clementine and Apollo images, resulting in the discovery of 110 more FFC and 85 <br />
+
published a comprehensive list of them. This new map, made by summer students interning at the Lunar &amp; Planetary Institute  
possible ones. Sadly, they have not published a list either, but I will try to get it from LPI so that the information can be added <br />
+
in Houston, is based on inspection of Clementine and Apollo images, resulting in the discovery of 110 more FFC and 85  
to the Moon-Wiki. With the LRO WAC mosaics that are becoming available it will be possible to confirm these (I doubt that <br />
+
possible ones. Sadly, they have not published a list either, but I will try to get it from LPI so that the information can be added  
Theophilus is a FFC) and probably find new ones. This much larger sample size will provide some PhD student the data <br />
+
to the Moon-Wiki. With the LRO WAC mosaics that are becoming available it will be possible to confirm these (I doubt that  
needed for a careful re-examination of FFC and perhaps new understanding of their origins.<br />
+
Theophilus is a FFC) and probably find new ones. This much larger sample size will provide some PhD student the data  
 +
needed for a careful re-examination of FFC and perhaps new understanding of their origins.
 +
<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br />
 
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br />

Latest revision as of 18:45, 13 October 2018

Wonderfully Modified Craters

LPOD-Dec29-10.jpg
image by J. Korteniemi et al (2010)

Floor-fractured craters are the most interesting on the Moon.

Well, you might say, what about Copernicus and Tycho - their floors aren't fractured and they are pretty interesting. True, but I wonder if they have as many different types of things to see as FFC? Consider FFC such as Alphonsus, Posidonius, Gassendi and Petavius. First, they are relatively large craters with uplifted floors and related concentric fractures. Second, these and other FFC often contain various kinds of rilles, concentric craters and dark halo craters. Few FFC are young enough to have rays (exception is Taruntius) because they already existed when mare basalts were being produced, which mostly ended about 3 to 2.5 b.y. ago. Nearly all FFC are on the margins of maria and the preferred model is that magma rose up basin fractures and ponded under the craters, ultimately lifting their floors, and often erupting lavas onto their floors. In 1976 Pete Schultz first brought attention to FFC as a class of modified impact craters and he identified 206 but never published a comprehensive list of them. This new map, made by summer students interning at the Lunar & Planetary Institute in Houston, is based on inspection of Clementine and Apollo images, resulting in the discovery of 110 more FFC and 85 possible ones. Sadly, they have not published a list either, but I will try to get it from LPI so that the information can be added to the Moon-Wiki. With the LRO WAC mosaics that are becoming available it will be possible to confirm these (I doubt that Theophilus is a FFC) and probably find new ones. This much larger sample size will provide some PhD student the data needed for a careful re-examination of FFC and perhaps new understanding of their origins.

Chuck Wood

Related Links
J. Korteniemi, D. L. Eldridge, T. Lough, L. Werblin, K. I. Singer and D. A. Kring (2010) ASSESSMENT OF LUNAR VOLCANIC MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: DISTRIBUTION OF FLOOR-FRACTURED CRATERS. 41st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, abstract 1335.

Yesterday's LPOD: Smooth Floors, Powerful Inferences

Tomorrow's LPOD: Throwing Out the Washbowl with the Bath Water



COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.