Difference between revisions of "December 19, 2009"
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<table class="wiki_table"> | <table class="wiki_table"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | <td><!-- | + | <td> <!-- RemoveRevolverMaps --> |
| − | + | <!-- RemoveRevolverMaps --> | |
| + | </td> | ||
<p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[December 18, 2009|Moondog Mysterie]] </p> | <p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[December 18, 2009|Moondog Mysterie]] </p> | ||
<p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[December 20, 2009|Phases in the Classroom]] </p> | <p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[December 20, 2009|Phases in the Classroom]] </p> | ||
| − | |||
<!-- End of content --> | <!-- End of content --> | ||
{{wiki/ArticleFooter}} | {{wiki/ArticleFooter}} | ||
Revision as of 20:50, 8 February 2015
Chunky Moon
image by Alex Sanz, Ayllón, Spain; north to the right
What is the surface of the Moon really like? Dramatic views with long shadows tricked 19th century observers into thinking it was full of spires, steep walls and a now infrequently used word, asperities. Seeing the Moon at full suggests a bright flat world of varying tonalities. There are few steep places, and as Apollo ground images showed, much of the surface is rolling and rounded, smoothed by billions of years of small scale impacts. This image offers a different way that the lunar surface sometimes appears. The surface has a tonal flatness, but the craters and hills are chunky, like massive constructs comfortably settled into the landscape. Nearly all the features we see in telescopic images are so large that they would disappear if we were on the ground. The expansive holes would become broad gentle depressions. This image conveys that feel.
Chuck Wood
Technical Details
11th Sept 2009, 04:05 U.T. SCT 11" at f/30 and a DMK 31 AU03 working at 30 fps. Seeing 6/10.
Related Links
Rükl plate 71
Yesterday's LPOD: Moondog Mysterie
Tomorrow's LPOD: Phases in the Classroom
COMMENTS?
Register, Log in, and join in the comments.
