Difference between revisions of "August 5, 2004"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=Ranger Cratering= | =Ranger Cratering= | ||
| − | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
<table width="85%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> | <table width="85%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> | ||
| − | + | <tr> | |
| − | + | </tr> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
</table> | </table> | ||
<table width="85%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> | <table width="85%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> | ||
| − | + | <tr> | |
| − | + | <td colspan="2"><div align="center"> | |
| − | + | [[File:LPOD-2004-08-05.jpeg|LPOD-2004-08-05.jpeg]] | |
| − | + | </div></td> | |
| − | + | </tr> | |
</table> | </table> | ||
<table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="8"> | <table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="8"> | ||
| − | + | <tr> | |
| − | + | <td><div align="center" span class="main_sm">Image Credit: [mailto:pjstooke@uwo.ca" class="one Phil Stooke]</div></td> | |
| − | + | </tr> | |
</table> | </table> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | |||
<table class="story" border="0" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" width="90%" cellpadding="10" align="center"><tr><td> | <table class="story" border="0" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" width="90%" cellpadding="10" align="center"><tr><td> | ||
| − | + | <p class="story" align="center"><b>Ranger Cratering</b></p> | |
| − | + | <p class="story" align="left"> | |
Identification of craters made by spacecraft impact on the Moon is valuable because it permits calibration of impact energy and crater size relations. And its fun. The camera failure on the otherwise successful [http://www.lpod.org/archive/2004/07/LPOD-2004-07-29.htm Ranger 6] meant that it's exact crash point is unknown. Now this mosaic of Clementine Long Wavelength Infrared images (right image) may solve that mystery. But first, here is some context. Image C is a one degree square from the [http://www.lpod.org/archive/2004/03/LPOD-2004-03-27.htm LTO] of the area (LTO60B4), here made of high sun Apollo images. Image D is the same image eaxctly, but overlaid with a mosaic of the Clementine LWIR images. LWIR doesn't give full coverage so there are gaps through which the LTO can be seen. The proposed Ranger 6 impact point is a unique dark spot in LWIR, but just one of many bright spots in the visible. This small triangular dark spot is only 7 km northwest of the tracking prediction for the Ranger 6 impact point. I propose that this is the Ranger 6 impact ejecta deposit. I looked at the Consolidated Lunar Atlas to see if the spot is 'new' - but alas, the CLA image of the area was taken after the impact! Also, the spot is only barely visible, if at all. The large crater seen in the Clementine view is shown on the [http://www.lpod.org/archive/2004/06/LPOD-2004-06-28.htm LAC] of the area and is visible in the CLA. This image was prepared as an illustration for my forthcoming atlas of lunar exploration. | Identification of craters made by spacecraft impact on the Moon is valuable because it permits calibration of impact energy and crater size relations. And its fun. The camera failure on the otherwise successful [http://www.lpod.org/archive/2004/07/LPOD-2004-07-29.htm Ranger 6] meant that it's exact crash point is unknown. Now this mosaic of Clementine Long Wavelength Infrared images (right image) may solve that mystery. But first, here is some context. Image C is a one degree square from the [http://www.lpod.org/archive/2004/03/LPOD-2004-03-27.htm LTO] of the area (LTO60B4), here made of high sun Apollo images. Image D is the same image eaxctly, but overlaid with a mosaic of the Clementine LWIR images. LWIR doesn't give full coverage so there are gaps through which the LTO can be seen. The proposed Ranger 6 impact point is a unique dark spot in LWIR, but just one of many bright spots in the visible. This small triangular dark spot is only 7 km northwest of the tracking prediction for the Ranger 6 impact point. I propose that this is the Ranger 6 impact ejecta deposit. I looked at the Consolidated Lunar Atlas to see if the spot is 'new' - but alas, the CLA image of the area was taken after the impact! Also, the spot is only barely visible, if at all. The large crater seen in the Clementine view is shown on the [http://www.lpod.org/archive/2004/06/LPOD-2004-06-28.htm LAC] of the area and is visible in the CLA. This image was prepared as an illustration for my forthcoming atlas of lunar exploration. | ||
| − | + | <blockquote> | |
| − | + | <p align="right"> — [mailto:pjstooke@uwo.ca Phil Stooke ]</p> | |
| − | + | </blockquote> | |
| − | + | <p><b>Technical Details:</b><br> | |
| − | + | Clementine LWIR images are small and dreadfully noisy. Nevertheless any amateur can work with them. NASA's Planetary Image Atlas allows them to be selected from a given area. I open the resulting GIF images in Photoshop, convert them to grayscale, and do some preliminary noise removal and contrast enhancement. Then those images are stacked and averaged. It is necessary to collect numerous images from the orbit you want to work on and stack enough of them that real landscape features are averaged out, leaving only the noise. This 'average' image can then be subtracted from the original frames. The results are good - since LWIR measures temperature, sunlit slopes are warm and look bright, shadier slopes are cool and look dark. The image looks like a regular photo with shading, even near the equator where Clementine visible images look very bland.</p> | |
| − | + | <p><b>Related Links:</b> <br> | |
| − | + | [http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=1994-004A&ex=3 Clementine LWIR] </p> | |
| − | + | <p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> Lunar Resort</p> | |
| − | + | </tr> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
</table> | </table> | ||
| − | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | |||
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="4"> | <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="4"> | ||
| − | + | <tr> | |
| − | + | <td><hr></td> | |
| − | + | </tr> | |
| − | + | <tr> | |
| − | + | <td><p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author & Editor:</b><br> | |
| − | + | [mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Charles A. Wood]</p> | |
| − | + | <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Technical Consultant:</b><br> | |
| − | + | [mailto:anthony@perseus.gr Anthony Ayiomamitis]</p> | |
| − | + | <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>A service of:</b><br> | |
| − | + | [http://www.observingthesky.org/ ObservingTheSky.Org]</p> | |
| − | + | <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Visit these other PODs:</b> <br> | |
| − | + | [http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html Astronomy] | [http://www.msss.com/ Mars] | [http://epod.usra.edu/ Earth]</p> | |
| − | + | </td> | |
| − | + | </tr> | |
| − | |||
</table> | </table> | ||
| − | |||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
---- | ---- | ||
===COMMENTS?=== | ===COMMENTS?=== | ||
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment. | Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment. | ||
Revision as of 18:23, 4 January 2015
Ranger Cratering
|
Image Credit: " class="one Phil Stooke |
|
Ranger Cratering Identification of craters made by spacecraft impact on the Moon is valuable because it permits calibration of impact energy and crater size relations. And its fun. The camera failure on the otherwise successful Ranger 6 meant that it's exact crash point is unknown. Now this mosaic of Clementine Long Wavelength Infrared images (right image) may solve that mystery. But first, here is some context. Image C is a one degree square from the LTO of the area (LTO60B4), here made of high sun Apollo images. Image D is the same image eaxctly, but overlaid with a mosaic of the Clementine LWIR images. LWIR doesn't give full coverage so there are gaps through which the LTO can be seen. The proposed Ranger 6 impact point is a unique dark spot in LWIR, but just one of many bright spots in the visible. This small triangular dark spot is only 7 km northwest of the tracking prediction for the Ranger 6 impact point. I propose that this is the Ranger 6 impact ejecta deposit. I looked at the Consolidated Lunar Atlas to see if the spot is 'new' - but alas, the CLA image of the area was taken after the impact! Also, the spot is only barely visible, if at all. The large crater seen in the Clementine view is shown on the LAC of the area and is visible in the CLA. This image was prepared as an illustration for my forthcoming atlas of lunar exploration. Technical Details: Related Links: Tomorrow's LPOD: Lunar Resort |
Author & Editor: Technical Consultant: A service of: |
COMMENTS?
Click on this icon File:PostIcon.jpg at the upper right to post a comment.
