Difference between revisions of "April 6, 2010"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:1:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:1:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Apr6-10.jpg/132418517/LPOD-Apr6-10.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Apr6-10.jpg|LPOD-Apr6-10.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16 --><br />
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Apr6-10.jpg/132418517/LPOD-Apr6-10.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Apr6-10.jpg|LPOD-Apr6-10.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:16 --><br />
<em>image by [mailto:ph7_347@hotmail.com" rel="nofollow Tiziano Olivetti], Italy</em><br />
+
<em>image by [mailto:ph7_347@hotmail.com Tiziano Olivetti], Italy</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
LPOD has featured so many great images of Eratosthenes that I have nothing new to say, but Tiziano's image is too grand to pass up. Although the radiating ejecta and secondary craters on the mare floor are impressive, what catches my eye are the flat spots on the crater's floor. Is it impact melt? I would think not since melt is only preserved so long and Eratosthenes is perhaps twice as old as Copernicus. The way to tell is to check with higher resolution images. A Lunar Orbiter V [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunarorbiter/frame/?5135" rel="nofollow frame] shows that the apparently flat areas are not really fllat, but they are darker than the rest of the floor. So far, there doesn't seem to be a hyper-resolution LRO [http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc#damoon" rel="nofollow image] of the flat spots. So lacking definitive evidence it is still possible to wildly speculate: the flattish, dark area is impact melt that has been eroded, broken and nearly lost all of its pristine character.<br />
+
LPOD has featured so many great images of Eratosthenes that I have nothing new to say, but Tiziano's image is too grand to pass up. Although the radiating ejecta and secondary craters on the mare floor are impressive, what catches my eye are the flat spots on the crater's floor. Is it impact melt? I would think not since melt is only preserved so long and Eratosthenes is perhaps twice as old as Copernicus. The way to tell is to check with higher resolution images. A Lunar Orbiter V [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/lunarorbiter/frame/?5135 frame] shows that the apparently flat areas are not really fllat, but they are darker than the rest of the floor. So far, there doesn't seem to be a hyper-resolution LRO [http://wms.lroc.asu.edu/lroc#damoon image] of the flat spots. So lacking definitive evidence it is still possible to wildly speculate: the flattish, dark area is impact melt that has been eroded, broken and nearly lost all of its pristine character.<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow Chuck Wood]</em><br />
+
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<strong>Technical Details</strong><br />
 
<strong>Technical Details</strong><br />
Line 16: Line 16:
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<hr />
 
<hr />
<div>You can support LPOD when you buy any book from Amazon thru [http://www.lpod.org/?page_id=591" rel="nofollow LPOD!]<br />
+
<div>You can support LPOD when you buy any book from Amazon thru [http://www.lpod.org/?page_id=591 LPOD!]<br />
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
----
 
----
 
===COMMENTS?===  
 
===COMMENTS?===  
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.
+
Register, and click on the <b>Discussion</b> tab at the top of the page.

Revision as of 17:18, 11 January 2015

Flat Out of Luck

LPOD-Apr6-10.jpg
image by Tiziano Olivetti, Italy

LPOD has featured so many great images of Eratosthenes that I have nothing new to say, but Tiziano's image is too grand to pass up. Although the radiating ejecta and secondary craters on the mare floor are impressive, what catches my eye are the flat spots on the crater's floor. Is it impact melt? I would think not since melt is only preserved so long and Eratosthenes is perhaps twice as old as Copernicus. The way to tell is to check with higher resolution images. A Lunar Orbiter V frame shows that the apparently flat areas are not really fllat, but they are darker than the rest of the floor. So far, there doesn't seem to be a hyper-resolution LRO image of the flat spots. So lacking definitive evidence it is still possible to wildly speculate: the flattish, dark area is impact melt that has been eroded, broken and nearly lost all of its pristine character.

Chuck Wood

Technical Details
See image bottom

Related Links
Rükl plate 21


You can support LPOD when you buy any book from Amazon thru LPOD!

COMMENTS?

Register, and click on the Discussion tab at the top of the page.