Difference between revisions of "April 3, 2004"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=Mercy, Mersenius!=
 
=Mercy, Mersenius!=
 
</p>
 
 
<table width="640"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2">
 
<table width="640"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2">
    <tr>
+
<tr>
      <td width="50%"><h2 align="left">Mercy, Mersenius!</h2></td>
+
</tr>
     
 
  <td width="50%"><h2 align="right">April  3, 2004</h2></td>
 
    </tr>
 
 
</table>
 
</table>
 
<table width="85%"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2">
 
<table width="85%"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2">
    <tr>
+
<tr>
      <td colspan="2"><div align="center">
+
<td colspan="2"><div align="center">
<IMG SRC="images/LPOD-2004-04-03.jpeg" NAME="main_image" width="557" height="400" border="0"></div>
+
[[File:LPOD-2004-04-03.jpeg|LPOD-2004-04-03.jpeg]]</div>
+
</td>
      </td>
+
</tr>
  </tr>
 
 
</table>
 
</table>
 
<table width="100%"  border="0" cellpadding="8">
 
<table width="100%"  border="0" cellpadding="8">
    <tr>
+
<tr>
      <td><div align="center" span class="main_sm">Image Credit:  <a class="one" HREF="mailto:benoit_schillings@yahoo.com">Benoit Schillings</A></div></td>
+
<td><div align="center" span class="main_sm">Image Credit:  [mailto:benoit_schillings@yahoo.com Benoit Schillings]</div></td>
    </tr>
+
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
  </p>
 
 
<table class="story" border="0" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" width="90%" cellpadding="10" align="center"><tr><td>
 
<table class="story" border="0" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" width="90%" cellpadding="10" align="center"><tr><td>
 
+
<p class="story" align="center"><b>Mercy, Mersenius! </b></p>
  <p class="story" align="center"><b>Mercy, Mersenius! </b></p>
+
<p class="story" align="left">        Mersenius is in the second rank of lunar craters. Not a must-see like Copernicus, Plato or Gassendi, but a good
 
+
crater with more interesting features than are obvious. Mersenius is 84 km wide and about 2.3 km deep. But as has
  <p class="story" align="left">        Mersenius is in the second rank of lunar craters. Not a must-see like Copernicus, Plato or Gassendi, but a good
+
been known for more than 125 years, Mersenius appears to have a domed floor so its depth may be more varied than  
        crater with more interesting features than are obvious. Mersenius is 84 km wide and about 2.3 km deep. But as has
+
for normal craters. In his 1876 book, <I>The Moon</I>, Neison quoted Schmidt as saying that Mersenius had a  
        been known for more than 125 years, Mersenius appears to have a domed floor so its depth may be more varied than  
+
"strongly-convex" floor and estimated its center to be 450 m higher than near the walls. This remarkable low sun  
        for normal craters. In his 1876 book, <I>The Moon</I>, Neison quoted Schmidt as saying that Mersenius had a  
+
image by Benoit Schillings gives little evidence for a gradually decreasing elevation westward from the center  
        "strongly-convex" floor and estimated its center to be 450 m higher than near the walls. This remarkable low sun  
+
of the floor, but does show a shadow/depression where the west wall meets the floor. It seems unlikely that this  
        image by Benoit Schillings gives little evidence for a gradually decreasing elevation westward from the center  
+
alone is 450 m of relief, but then all these shadow measurements are ancient - are there no modern measurements  
        of the floor, but does show a shadow/depression where the west wall meets the floor. It seems unlikely that this  
+
of this crater's geometry? The line of overlapping craters on the floor are aligned with Imbrium, and thus may be
        alone is 450 m of relief, but then all these shadow measurements are ancient - are there no modern measurements  
+
distant secondaries from that basin-forming impact. The image also reveals more delicate rilles on the crater's  
        of this crater's geometry? The line of overlapping craters on the floor are aligned with Imbrium, and thus may be
+
floor than I have seen on any other Earth-based image. These are very difficult to image or observe - even the  
        distant secondaries from that basin-forming impact. The image also reveals more delicate rilles on the crater's  
+
Great Schmidt of Athens saw only two, and they were "very difficult." Small pyroclastic  
        floor than I have seen on any other Earth-based image. These are very difficult to image or observe - even the  
+
[../02/LPOD-2004-02-10.htm deposits] have also been detected around the rilles.  
        Great Schmidt of Athens saw only two, and they were "very difficult." Small pyroclastic  
+
Mersenius must be another floor-fractured [../02/LPOD-2004-02-10.htm crater]. </p>
        [../02/LPOD-2004-02-10.htm deposits] have also been detected around the rilles.  
+
<blockquote>
        Mersenius must be another floor-fractured [../02/LPOD-2004-02-10.htm crater]. </p>
+
<p align="right" class="story">&#8212; [mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</p>
  <blockquote>
+
</blockquote>  <p><b>Technical Details:</b><br>
    <p align="right" class="story">&#8212; [mailto:chuck@observingthesky.org Chuck Wood]</p>
+
Taken with an 18 inch F/4.5 newtonian, double barlow with a firewire 640x480 camera; combination of  
  </blockquote>  <p><b>Technical Details:</b><br>
+
about 150 frames. Image processing (image registrration etc...) done with home-made software which  
 
+
on top of doing frame selection and alignement, distorts the images to counter the distortion induce
                      Taken with an 18 inch F/4.5 newtonian, double barlow with a firewire 640x480 camera; combination of  
+
by the seeing - this helps a lot for the image quality. With a normal regular best fit stack, you  
                    about 150 frames. Image processing (image registrration etc...) done with home-made software which  
+
will always have a better resolution at or near the registration point. My algorithm does a  
                    on top of doing frame selection and alignement, distorts the images to counter the distortion induce
+
distortion of the whole image to get an overall best fit for the whole image, not just for a single  
                    by the seeing - this helps a lot for the image quality. With a normal regular best fit stack, you  
+
point. </p>
                    will always have a better resolution at or near the registration point. My algorithm does a  
+
<p class="story"><b>Related Links:</b><br>
                    distortion of the whole image to get an overall best fit for the whole image, not just for a single  
+
[http://www.astrosurf.com/benoit/#PLimages Benoit Schillings Web Page]<br>
                    point. </p>
+
[http://www.lpi.usra.edu/research/lunar_orbiter/images/img/iv_149_h1.jpg Lunar Orbiter View]</p>
 
+
<p class="story"> <b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> Conjunctions Galore!</p>
  <p class"story"><b>Related Links:</b><br>
+
</td>
  [http://www.astrosurf.com/benoit/#PLimages Benoit Schillings Web Page]<br>
 
  [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/research/lunar_orbiter/images/img/iv_149_h1.jpg Lunar Orbiter View]</p>
 
 
 
  <p class"story"> <b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> Conjunctions Galore!</p>
 
 
 
  <p><img src="../../../MainPage/spacer.gif" width="640" height="1"></p>
 
  </td>
 
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
 
+
<!-- start bottom -->
  <!-- start bottom -->
+
<hr>
  <hr width="640">
+
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author & Editor:</b><br>
  <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author & Editor:</b><br>
+
[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Charles A. Wood]</p>
      [mailto:chuck@observingthesky.org Charles A. Wood]</p>
+
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Technical Consultant:</b><br>
      <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Technical Consultant:</b><br>
+
[mailto:anthony@perseus.gr Anthony Ayiomamitis]</p>
      [mailto:anthony@perseus.gr Anthony Ayiomamitis]</p>
+
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>A service of:</b><br>
      <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>[mailto:webmaster@entropysponge.com Contact Webmaster]</b></p>
+
[http://www.observingthesky.org/ ObservingTheSky.Org]</p>
      <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>A service of:</b><br>
+
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Visit these other PODs:</b> <br>
      <a class="one" href="http://www.observingthesky.org/">ObservingTheSky.Org</a></p>
+
[http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html Astronomy] | [http://www.msss.com/ Mars] | [http://epod.usra.edu/ Earth]</p>
      <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Visit these other PODs:</b> <br>
+
<p>&nbsp;</p>
      <a class="one" href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html">Astronomy</a> | <a class="one" href="http://www.msss.com/">Mars</a> | <a class="one" href="http://epod.usra.edu/">Earth</a></p>
 
  <p>&nbsp;</p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
----
 
----
 
===COMMENTS?===  
 
===COMMENTS?===  
 
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.
 
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.

Revision as of 18:18, 4 January 2015

Mercy, Mersenius!

LPOD-2004-04-03.jpeg
Image Credit: Benoit Schillings

Mercy, Mersenius!

Mersenius is in the second rank of lunar craters. Not a must-see like Copernicus, Plato or Gassendi, but a good crater with more interesting features than are obvious. Mersenius is 84 km wide and about 2.3 km deep. But as has been known for more than 125 years, Mersenius appears to have a domed floor so its depth may be more varied than for normal craters. In his 1876 book, The Moon, Neison quoted Schmidt as saying that Mersenius had a "strongly-convex" floor and estimated its center to be 450 m higher than near the walls. This remarkable low sun image by Benoit Schillings gives little evidence for a gradually decreasing elevation westward from the center of the floor, but does show a shadow/depression where the west wall meets the floor. It seems unlikely that this alone is 450 m of relief, but then all these shadow measurements are ancient - are there no modern measurements of this crater's geometry? The line of overlapping craters on the floor are aligned with Imbrium, and thus may be distant secondaries from that basin-forming impact. The image also reveals more delicate rilles on the crater's floor than I have seen on any other Earth-based image. These are very difficult to image or observe - even the Great Schmidt of Athens saw only two, and they were "very difficult." Small pyroclastic [../02/LPOD-2004-02-10.htm deposits] have also been detected around the rilles. Mersenius must be another floor-fractured [../02/LPOD-2004-02-10.htm crater].

Chuck Wood

Technical Details:

Taken with an 18 inch F/4.5 newtonian, double barlow with a firewire 640x480 camera; combination of about 150 frames. Image processing (image registrration etc...) done with home-made software which on top of doing frame selection and alignement, distorts the images to counter the distortion induce by the seeing - this helps a lot for the image quality. With a normal regular best fit stack, you will always have a better resolution at or near the registration point. My algorithm does a distortion of the whole image to get an overall best fit for the whole image, not just for a single

point.

Related Links:
Benoit Schillings Web Page
Lunar Orbiter View

Tomorrow's LPOD: Conjunctions Galore!


Author & Editor:
Charles A. Wood

Technical Consultant:
Anthony Ayiomamitis

A service of:
ObservingTheSky.Org

Visit these other PODs:
Astronomy | Mars | Earth

 


COMMENTS?

Click on this icon File:PostIcon.jpg at the upper right to post a comment.