May 10, 2018

From LPOD
Revision as of 00:04, 10 May 2018 by Api (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ =Visualization of an Unimportant Crater= Originally published January 5, 2009 <!-- Start of content --> <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:1:<h1> --> <!--...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Visualization of an Unimportant Crater

Originally published January 5, 2009 LPOD-Jan5-09.jpg
image from ISRO Chandrayaan-1

The Indian Space Research Organization has come out with another example of the capability of the Chandrayaan-1 lunar orbiter. Unfortunately, I can not find any text describing exactly what this shows so I will invent an explanation! The upper left view is from the Terrain Mapping stereo Camera of the 34 km wide farside crater Coulomb C. This image and a second one (not shown) from when the space crater moved ahead in its orbit allowed a digital terrain model (DTM) to be constructed using the offsets of features when seen in stereo from the two slightly different look directions. This is a standard technique for the Earth but works better on the Moon because there is no atmosphere to cause complications and no water or vegetation to hide the surface. The image at bottom left is the resulting DTM with shades of gray representing different elevations. Colorizing the DTM (bottom right) makes it easier to read and creates a contour map. Digitally draping the image (upper left) over the DTM (bottom left) results in a 3-D image (upper right) that can be viewed from any direction. The figure is labeled 2.5 D because on the computer screen we see a 2 D image of the 3 D object - this is pettifoggery. A goal of Chandrayaan-1 is to construct a high resolution (10 m) topographic map of the entire Moon, and this shows that ISRO can do it. Coulomb C is a pretty nondescript crater - the broad lump on the floor may be a combination of a central peak and material that slumped from the rim. I am pleased to see this new release, but why, oh why didn't they chose a more dramatic feature?

Chuck Wood

Technical Details
Who knows?

Yesterday's LPOD: Travelogue

Tomorrow's LPOD: Two for One



COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.