Difference between revisions of "May 10, 2005"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
</table>
 
</table>
 
<table width="80%"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
 
<table width="80%"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr><td><div align="center" class="main_sm">Image Credit: [mailto:mwirths@superaje.com Mike Wirths]</p>
+
<tr><td><div align="center" class="main_sm"><p>Image Credit: [mailto:mwirths@superaje.com Mike Wirths]</p>
 
</div></td>
 
</div></td>
 
</tr>   
 
</tr>   
Line 21: Line 21:
 
<p align="left">Theophilus is one of the lunar superstars - a magnificent crater that attracts the attention of observers and imagers. It is a complex crater like Copernicus, but slightly bigger (100 vs 93 km). Its terraces are not as well formed or as well preserved as those in Copernicus, but its central mountains are much bigger. The reason is totally unknown. In general, central peaks are larger in diameter and height in larger craters, but there is great variability. The peaks of the same size crater Cyrillus (bottom left) are smaller and more rounded, but who knows how much of that may be related to being pummelled by Theo’s ejecta. The flat, relatively smooth floor in Theophilus probably includes target rocks melted by the energy of the impact that were ejected nearly vertically. That they splashed back down is obvious from Apollo 16 [[February_1,_2004|images]] that reveal melt ponds caught in hollows immediately outside the crater and on terraces inside it. </p>
 
<p align="left">Theophilus is one of the lunar superstars - a magnificent crater that attracts the attention of observers and imagers. It is a complex crater like Copernicus, but slightly bigger (100 vs 93 km). Its terraces are not as well formed or as well preserved as those in Copernicus, but its central mountains are much bigger. The reason is totally unknown. In general, central peaks are larger in diameter and height in larger craters, but there is great variability. The peaks of the same size crater Cyrillus (bottom left) are smaller and more rounded, but who knows how much of that may be related to being pummelled by Theo’s ejecta. The flat, relatively smooth floor in Theophilus probably includes target rocks melted by the energy of the impact that were ejected nearly vertically. That they splashed back down is obvious from Apollo 16 [[February_1,_2004|images]] that reveal melt ponds caught in hollows immediately outside the crater and on terraces inside it. </p>
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
<p align="right">&#8212; [mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</blockquote>
+
<p align="right">&#8212; [mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</p></blockquote>
 
<p align="left"><b>Technical Details:</b><br>
 
<p align="left"><b>Technical Details:</b><br>
 
April 15, 2005. 18" dob + Atik webcam + 5X's barlow + Baader IR passband filter.</p>
 
April 15, 2005. 18" dob + Atik webcam + 5X's barlow + Baader IR passband filter.</p>

Revision as of 20:19, 17 January 2015

Theo as You've Never See It

LPOD-2005-05-10.jpeg

Image Credit: Mike Wirths


Theo as You've Never See It

Theophilus is one of the lunar superstars - a magnificent crater that attracts the attention of observers and imagers. It is a complex crater like Copernicus, but slightly bigger (100 vs 93 km). Its terraces are not as well formed or as well preserved as those in Copernicus, but its central mountains are much bigger. The reason is totally unknown. In general, central peaks are larger in diameter and height in larger craters, but there is great variability. The peaks of the same size crater Cyrillus (bottom left) are smaller and more rounded, but who knows how much of that may be related to being pummelled by Theo’s ejecta. The flat, relatively smooth floor in Theophilus probably includes target rocks melted by the energy of the impact that were ejected nearly vertically. That they splashed back down is obvious from Apollo 16 images that reveal melt ponds caught in hollows immediately outside the crater and on terraces inside it.

Chuck Wood

Technical Details:
April 15, 2005. 18" dob + Atik webcam + 5X's barlow + Baader IR passband filter.

Tomorrow's LPOD: Imperial Image



Author & Editor:
Charles A. Wood

Technical Consultant:
Anthony Ayiomamitis

Contact Translator:
Pablo Lonnie Pacheco Railey (Es)
Christian Legrand (Fr)

Contact Webmaster

A service of:
ObservingTheSky.Org

Visit these other PODs:
Astronomy | Mars | Earth

 


COMMENTS?

Register, and click on the Discussion tab at the top of the page.