Difference between revisions of "June 9, 2006"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ =Interlude= <div class="post" id="post-324"> <div class="storycontent"> <p>PosidoniusDrawing.jpg</p> <p><em>drawing by [mailt...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=Interlude=
 
=Interlude=
 +
<div class="post" id="post-324">
  
+
<div class="storycontent">
<div class="post" id="post-324">
+
<p>[[File:PosidoniusDrawing.jpg|PosidoniusDrawing.jpg]]</p>
 
<div class="storycontent">
 
<p>[[File:PosidoniusDrawing.jpg|PosidoniusDrawing.jpg]]</p>
 
 
<p><em>drawing by [mailto:bernardnomblot@wanadoo.fr  Bernard Nomblot ]</em></p>
 
<p><em>drawing by [mailto:bernardnomblot@wanadoo.fr  Bernard Nomblot ]</em></p>
 
<p>Imaging the Moon has become a precise art, but the art of drawing the lunar surface remains subjective and emotional - and that is a good thing. I would not trust a drawing to be an accurate depiction of details (although it might be), but I would hope a drawing would evocatively capture the feeling of an observing experience. This one by Bernard does exactly that. When we look through an eyepiece - and especially when we remember such observations - shadows are richly black and the rims catching the Sun are brilliantly white. The details we strain to see, such as the rilles in Posidonius, seem razer sharp (especially in memory) while the rest of the field of view is often schematic. The human eye, brain and hand create a representation with selective emphasis, and a drop off in detail away from the focal point, reaching a white nothingness beyond the area of interest.  Pity the poor technofile, whose camera indiscriminately captures everything!  </p>
 
<p>Imaging the Moon has become a precise art, but the art of drawing the lunar surface remains subjective and emotional - and that is a good thing. I would not trust a drawing to be an accurate depiction of details (although it might be), but I would hope a drawing would evocatively capture the feeling of an observing experience. This one by Bernard does exactly that. When we look through an eyepiece - and especially when we remember such observations - shadows are richly black and the rims catching the Sun are brilliantly white. The details we strain to see, such as the rilles in Posidonius, seem razer sharp (especially in memory) while the rest of the field of view is often schematic. The human eye, brain and hand create a representation with selective emphasis, and a drop off in detail away from the focal point, reaching a white nothingness beyond the area of interest.  Pity the poor technofile, whose camera indiscriminately captures everything!  </p>
Line 17: Line 15:
 
<p align="center">
 
<p align="center">
 
<i>You can support LPOD when you buy ANY book from Amazon thru [http://www.lpod.org/?page_id=102  LPOD!]</i></p>
 
<i>You can support LPOD when you buy ANY book from Amazon thru [http://www.lpod.org/?page_id=102  LPOD!]</i></p>
</div>
+
</div>
 
 
 
 
----
 
----
 
===COMMENTS?===  
 
===COMMENTS?===  
 
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.
 
Click on this icon [[image:PostIcon.jpg]] at the upper right to post a comment.

Revision as of 17:38, 4 January 2015

Interlude

PosidoniusDrawing.jpg

drawing by Bernard Nomblot

Imaging the Moon has become a precise art, but the art of drawing the lunar surface remains subjective and emotional - and that is a good thing. I would not trust a drawing to be an accurate depiction of details (although it might be), but I would hope a drawing would evocatively capture the feeling of an observing experience. This one by Bernard does exactly that. When we look through an eyepiece - and especially when we remember such observations - shadows are richly black and the rims catching the Sun are brilliantly white. The details we strain to see, such as the rilles in Posidonius, seem razer sharp (especially in memory) while the rest of the field of view is often schematic. The human eye, brain and hand create a representation with selective emphasis, and a drop off in detail away from the focal point, reaching a white nothingness beyond the area of interest. Pity the poor technofile, whose camera indiscriminately captures everything!

Chuck Wood

Technical Details:
5 August 2004 with an 8” sct. Bernard writes: I love this kind of slow work, because when drawing you have to look at the moon, not only seeing it. At telescope I work with intensity code: 0 for black, 10 for dazzling white; I redraw the drawing on strong paper with different pencils and china ink for the black.

Related Links:
Rükl plates 14 & 24
My favorite Posidonius image

You can support LPOD when you buy ANY book from Amazon thru LPOD!


COMMENTS?

Click on this icon File:PostIcon.jpg at the upper right to post a comment.