Difference between revisions of "May 16, 2013"
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | <strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | ||
| − | Rükl plate [https://the-moon.us/wiki/R%C3% | + | Rükl plate [https://the-moon.us/wiki/R%C3%BCkl_63 63]<br /> |
<em>[http://lpod.wikispaces.com/21st+Century+Atlas+of+the+Moon 21st Century Atlas]</em> chart 24.<br /> | <em>[http://lpod.wikispaces.com/21st+Century+Atlas+of+the+Moon 21st Century Atlas]</em> chart 24.<br /> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 13 October 2018
Lonesome Chain
approximate north up image by Mike Wirths, Baja California, Mexico
 |
Hainzel A and B were probably formed by the simultaneous impact of a split comet or asteroid. Hainzel may have been a pre-existing older crater or perhaps was formed slightly earlier as part of the A/B collisions. What is remarkable is the very asymmetric distribution of ejecta. There is very little in any direction except to the north towards Ramsden. A broad swath of radial ridges and gullies extend from A about 30 km. Beyond that a single squiggly chain of secondaries goes 150 km from the crater rim to the edge of the mare. The chain extends another 35-40 km across the mare with a surrounding pin-pricks of brightness. The LRO QuickMap shows this extension across the mare to be a classic herringbone secondary chain with slightly overlapping craters wrapped in ejecta, making a v-pattern. This entire 190 km long chain is radial to the intersection of A and B, rather than the center of A. This seems to be strong evidence that A and B did form simultaneously. I can't see evidence of the herringbone pattern anywhere along the chain except where it cuts the mare. Perhaps the highland terrain is too rough for it to form.
|
Yesterday's LPOD: Heavy On the Hydrogen
Tomorrow's LPOD: Steps To the Pole
COMMENTS?
Register, Log in, and join in the comments.
