Difference between revisions of "October 22, 2004"
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<table width="80%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> | <table width="80%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> | ||
− | <tr><td><div align="center" class="main_sm">Image Credit: [mailto:frankb@celestialwonders.com Frank Barrett]</p> | + | <tr><td><div align="center" class="main_sm"><p>Image Credit: [mailto:frankb@celestialwonders.com Frank Barrett]</p> |
</div></td> | </div></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> |
Revision as of 21:29, 20 January 2015
H-Alpha Moon
Image Credit: Frank Barrett |
H-Alpha Moon Most images of the Moon are taken in visible light, which is where human eyes are most sensitive. But here (right) is one taken through a hydrogen-alpha filter which is normally used to image the Sun in a narrow red part (656.3 nm) of the visible spectrum. I compare this image to Frank's previous LPOD (and APOD!) image on the left which was taken in visible light. I enhanced both images, making comparison a little uncertain. Nevertheless, there are a few interesting comparisons. first, the two images look quite similar - probably because the Sun is quite bright at H-alpha wavelengths, contributing significantly to its total visible brightness. Second, there are some differences. In H-alpha, Mare Nectaris is more muted - the rays that cross it are more strongly depicted. The same seems true for maria Fecunditatis and Crisium - both are low in titanium. Additionally, the dark mare patches south of Mare Serenitatis have more contrast on the H-alpha image. Frank's image suggests that amateurs may want to experiment imaging the Moon thru different color filters to explore compositional differences in the maria. Technical Details: Related Links: Tomorrow's LPOD: Imaging the First Lunar Photographer |
Author & Editor: Technical Consultant: Contact Translator: A service of: |
COMMENTS?
Register, and click on the Discussion tab at the top of the page.