Difference between revisions of "August 20, 2014"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&lt;h1&gt; -->
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Aug20-14.jpg/518996678/LPOD-Aug20-14.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Aug20-14.jpg|LPOD-Aug20-14.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br />
 
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:&lt;img src=&quot;/file/view/LPOD-Aug20-14.jpg/518996678/LPOD-Aug20-14.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; /&gt; -->[[File:LPOD-Aug20-14.jpg|LPOD-Aug20-14.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br />
<em>mosaic compiled by CA Wood of screen shots from [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aT1s5s2LurM#t=330" rel="nofollow Luna movie]</em><br />
+
<em>mosaic compiled by CA Wood of screen shots from [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aT1s5s2LurM#t=330 Luna movie]</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
A remarkable documentary movie made by Pavel Klushantsev in 1965 has emerged on the Internet. This is a great example of what Ian Steadman, the <em>New Statesman</em> writer of an excellent [http://www.newstatesman.com/future-proof/2014/08/maybe-how-we-d-have-colonised-moon-if-soviet-union-had-got-there-first" rel="nofollow article] about the movie Луна́ (Moon), calls <em>retrofuturism</em>. The 51 minute video starts with discussions (in Russian) of the landscape of the Moon, explained by Soviet scientists, with emphasis on both impact and volcanic origins of craters. The second half of the video, the source of these screen shots, is a combination of animation and studio shots of how the Soviets envisioned their future exploration of the Moon. They believed that the dust would be so deep that snowshoes (dustshoes) might be needed to safely cross some surfaces. The cosmonaut rappelling down a crevice is a far more dangerous activity than NASA would ever allow, and the multi-legged rover suggests that the Soviets anticipated a Moon much rougher than it turned out to be. The last line of stills shows habitats, including a spherical cave formed by an explosion (nuclear?), and a device for accelerating rockets off the lunar surface. The video is fun, showing a Moon that should have/might have been. If it had happened I might be sitting now in one of the habitats writing a blog about what the home planet looked like today. <br />
+
A remarkable documentary movie made by Pavel Klushantsev in 1965 has emerged on the Internet. This is a great example of what Ian Steadman, the <em>New Statesman</em> writer of an excellent [http://www.newstatesman.com/future-proof/2014/08/maybe-how-we-d-have-colonised-moon-if-soviet-union-had-got-there-first article] about the movie Луна́ (Moon), calls <em>retrofuturism</em>. The 51 minute video starts with discussions (in Russian) of the landscape of the Moon, explained by Soviet scientists, with emphasis on both impact and volcanic origins of craters. The second half of the video, the source of these screen shots, is a combination of animation and studio shots of how the Soviets envisioned their future exploration of the Moon. They believed that the dust would be so deep that snowshoes (dustshoes) might be needed to safely cross some surfaces. The cosmonaut rappelling down a crevice is a far more dangerous activity than NASA would ever allow, and the multi-legged rover suggests that the Soviets anticipated a Moon much rougher than it turned out to be. The last line of stills shows habitats, including a spherical cave formed by an explosion (nuclear?), and a device for accelerating rockets off the lunar surface. The video is fun, showing a Moon that should have/might have been. If it had happened I might be sitting now in one of the habitats writing a blog about what the home planet looked like today. <br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow Chuck Wood]</em><br />
+
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<hr />
 
<hr />

Revision as of 19:11, 17 January 2015

луна́

LPOD-Aug20-14.jpg
mosaic compiled by CA Wood of screen shots from Luna movie

A remarkable documentary movie made by Pavel Klushantsev in 1965 has emerged on the Internet. This is a great example of what Ian Steadman, the New Statesman writer of an excellent article about the movie Луна́ (Moon), calls retrofuturism. The 51 minute video starts with discussions (in Russian) of the landscape of the Moon, explained by Soviet scientists, with emphasis on both impact and volcanic origins of craters. The second half of the video, the source of these screen shots, is a combination of animation and studio shots of how the Soviets envisioned their future exploration of the Moon. They believed that the dust would be so deep that snowshoes (dustshoes) might be needed to safely cross some surfaces. The cosmonaut rappelling down a crevice is a far more dangerous activity than NASA would ever allow, and the multi-legged rover suggests that the Soviets anticipated a Moon much rougher than it turned out to be. The last line of stills shows habitats, including a spherical cave formed by an explosion (nuclear?), and a device for accelerating rockets off the lunar surface. The video is fun, showing a Moon that should have/might have been. If it had happened I might be sitting now in one of the habitats writing a blog about what the home planet looked like today.

Chuck Wood