Difference between revisions of "November 27, 2013"
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<em>image by [mailto:a.n.zaitsev.glor@gmail.com Alexander Zaitsev], Lipetsk, Russia</em><br /> | <em>image by [mailto:a.n.zaitsev.glor@gmail.com Alexander Zaitsev], Lipetsk, Russia</em><br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| − | I don't know who first compared Phocylides and Nasmyth to the sole of a shoe or a footprint, but it is a good description. The larger Phocylides is the main part of the sole under the ball of a foot, and Nasmyth is the heel. The footprint must have been made by a runner for the sole is more depressed than the heel. Alexander's oblique view shows that the wall between the two parts of the sole is the lowest part of either crater's rim. A vertical [ | + | I don't know who first compared Phocylides and Nasmyth to the sole of a shoe or a footprint, but it is a good description. The larger Phocylides is the main part of the sole under the ball of a foot, and Nasmyth is the heel. The footprint must have been made by a runner for the sole is more depressed than the heel. Alexander's oblique view shows that the wall between the two parts of the sole is the lowest part of either crater's rim. A vertical [https://the-moon.us/wiki/Nasmyth view] shows that Phocylides is younger and overlaps Nasymth, and as commonly happens the overlapping rim is low because there was a void (the Nasmyth crater interior) rather than solid ground resisting it. The fact that Nasymth, Phocylides and nearby Wargentin have different depths shows that they could not have been filled by an interconnected magma source. Other features of interest are nearby. <br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | <em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | ||
| − | <em>This is a repeat of a classic LPOD from [http://lpod. | + | <em>This is a repeat of a classic LPOD from [http://www2.lpod.org/wiki/September_10,_2011 Sept 10, 2011.]</em><br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<strong>Technical Details</strong><br /> | <strong>Technical Details</strong><br /> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | <strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | ||
| − | Rükl plate [ | + | Rükl plate [https://the-moon.us/wiki/R%C3%BCkl_70 70]<br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[November 26, 2013|My Best Manners - And Then Some]] </p> | <p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[November 26, 2013|My Best Manners - And Then Some]] </p> | ||
Latest revision as of 07:34, 28 October 2018
A Giant Footprint
image by Alexander Zaitsev, Lipetsk, Russia
I don't know who first compared Phocylides and Nasmyth to the sole of a shoe or a footprint, but it is a good description. The larger Phocylides is the main part of the sole under the ball of a foot, and Nasmyth is the heel. The footprint must have been made by a runner for the sole is more depressed than the heel. Alexander's oblique view shows that the wall between the two parts of the sole is the lowest part of either crater's rim. A vertical view shows that Phocylides is younger and overlaps Nasymth, and as commonly happens the overlapping rim is low because there was a void (the Nasmyth crater interior) rather than solid ground resisting it. The fact that Nasymth, Phocylides and nearby Wargentin have different depths shows that they could not have been filled by an interconnected magma source. Other features of interest are nearby.
Chuck Wood
This is a repeat of a classic LPOD from Sept 10, 2011.
Technical Details
2011/08/25; 01:05:10 UT. SW 305/1500 telescope + VAC-135 (b/w 15 fps) camera with the red filter and barlow 2.5X
Related Links
Rükl plate 70
Yesterday's LPOD: My Best Manners - And Then Some
Tomorrow's LPOD: Pre or Post?
COMMENTS?
Register, Log in, and join in the comments.
