Difference between revisions of "June 5, 2004"
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=Copernicus= | =Copernicus= | ||
+ | <!-- Start of content --> | ||
<table width="640" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="2"> | <table width="640" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="2"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
+ | <p class="main_sm" align="center">Image Credit: [mailto:Bruno.DAVERSIN@lahague.com Bruno Daversin]</p> | ||
<table class="story" border="0" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" width="90%" cellpadding="10" align="center"> | <table class="story" border="0" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" width="90%" cellpadding="10" align="center"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><p class="Story" align="center"><b>Copernicus</b></p> | <td><p class="Story" align="center"><b>Copernicus</b></p> | ||
− | <p class="story" align="left">[ | + | <p class="story" align="left">[[January_10,_2004|Copernicus]] is the most important crater on the Moon. How can I call out any one as |
"most important," you ask? Let me modify the first sentence and you will probably agree: Copernicus is the most important | "most important," you ask? Let me modify the first sentence and you will probably agree: Copernicus is the most important | ||
crater on the Moon because of what it has taught us. Here are three lessons. (1) 93 km wide Copernicus is the prototype | crater on the Moon because of what it has taught us. Here are three lessons. (1) 93 km wide Copernicus is the prototype | ||
Line 31: | Line 33: | ||
Image obtained 2003 october 18th, 04h33 UT with Ludiver Observatory (Normandy, France) 600 mm (24") F/D=16 | Image obtained 2003 october 18th, 04h33 UT with Ludiver Observatory (Normandy, France) 600 mm (24") F/D=16 | ||
cassegrain telescope + infrared filter + TouCam Pro in B&W mode. Seeing: 7/10 Pickering. Processed with IRIS | cassegrain telescope + infrared filter + TouCam Pro in B&W mode. Seeing: 7/10 Pickering. Processed with IRIS | ||
− | freeware: 400 frames registred, addition, vancittert filter applied. South is up. | + | freeware: 400 frames registred, addition, vancittert filter applied. South is up. </p> |
<p class="story" align="left"><i>Originally posted February 4, 2004 </i></p> | <p class="story" align="left"><i>Originally posted February 4, 2004 </i></p> | ||
<p class="story" align="left"><b>Related Links:</b><br> | <p class="story" align="left"><b>Related Links:</b><br> | ||
[http://www.ludiver.com/conquerir_espace_scientifique_lune.php Ludiver Observatory and Planetarium Moon Atlas] | [http://www.ludiver.com/conquerir_espace_scientifique_lune.php Ludiver Observatory and Planetarium Moon Atlas] | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | <p | + | <p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[June 4, 2004|Hippalus Arcs]] </p> |
+ | <p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[June 6, 2004|Humorum]] </p> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Line 42: | Line 45: | ||
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author & Editor:</b><br> | <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author & Editor:</b><br> | ||
[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Charles A. Wood]</p> | [mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Charles A. Wood]</p> | ||
− | < | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> |
− | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | |
− | < | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> |
− | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | |
− | < | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> |
− | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | |
+ | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
− | ---- | + | <!-- End of content --> |
− | + | {{wiki/ArticleFooter}} | |
− |
Latest revision as of 11:09, 6 June 2015
Copernicus
Image Credit: Bruno Daversin
Copernicus Copernicus is the most important crater on the Moon. How can I call out any one as "most important," you ask? Let me modify the first sentence and you will probably agree: Copernicus is the most important crater on the Moon because of what it has taught us. Here are three lessons. (1) 93 km wide Copernicus is the prototype of a complex impact crater. For lunar craters with diameters larger than about 15 km there are three consistent characteristics: inner walls with slumps or terraces, large relatively flat floors, and central peaks. (2) Eugene Shoemaker used Copernicus as the type example in his analysis of the physics of impact crater formation, explaining the features above, and secondary craters and rays. (3) Copernicus is more complicated than we usually admit. I discovered that, compared to other fresh complex craters, Copernicus is too shallow by 0.7 km, and its peaks are too low by 1 km. Thus, Copernicus is filled by 0.7 to 1.0 km of unknown material. Its not likely to be impact melt (which should only be 0.25 km thick), and the other option - lava flows - is generally not liked because of the implication that the Moon was still hot only 1 billion years ago. So as you admire this exceptional image from Bruno Daversin using the Ludiver 24" telescope consider what the smooth material on the floor could be - lava, impact melt or just the random deviations from averages. Technical Details: Originally posted February 4, 2004 Related Links: Yesterday's LPOD: Hippalus Arcs Tomorrow's LPOD: Humorum |
Author & Editor:
Charles A. Wood
COMMENTS?
Register, Log in, and join in the comments.