Difference between revisions of "February 13, 2004"
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=Copernicus in Color= | =Copernicus in Color= | ||
| + | <!-- Start of content --> | ||
<table width="640" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> | <table width="640" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
<table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="8"> | <table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="8"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | <td><div align="center | + | <td><div align="center"><p>Image Credit: [mailto:gaddis@flagmail.wr.usgs.gov Lisa Gaddis]</p></div></td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
Geological Survey in Flagstaff, AZ has been digitizing Lunar Orbiter images. One dramatic example of the value of | Geological Survey in Flagstaff, AZ has been digitizing Lunar Orbiter images. One dramatic example of the value of | ||
getting all the data digital is illustrated here. The image on the right is the somewhat standard Clementine | getting all the data digital is illustrated here. The image on the right is the somewhat standard Clementine | ||
| − | color composite made with three wavelengths of [ | + | color composite made with three wavelengths of [[January_10,_2004|Copernicus]]. In general, red |
colored areas are glass-rich impact melt, and blue is highland (anorthositic) materials. Co-registration of this | colored areas are glass-rich impact melt, and blue is highland (anorthositic) materials. Co-registration of this | ||
Clementine spectral image with the USGS digitized Lunar Orbiter IV image results in a topographically and | Clementine spectral image with the USGS digitized Lunar Orbiter IV image results in a topographically and | ||
| Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
underlying terrain. The fact that the impact melt doesn't occur uniformly around Copernicus leads to speculation | underlying terrain. The fact that the impact melt doesn't occur uniformly around Copernicus leads to speculation | ||
that Copernicus may have resulted from an oblique impact with the projectile coming from the south, southeast. | that Copernicus may have resulted from an oblique impact with the projectile coming from the south, southeast. | ||
| − | And melt on the floor suggest [ | + | And melt on the floor suggest [[February_4,_2004|volcanism]] has not been important! |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p><b>Technical Details:</b><br> | <p><b>Technical Details:</b><br> | ||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
[http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2004/1791.pdf Becker, Weller, Gaddis et al (2004) <i>Progress in Reviving Lunar Orbiter</i>i]<br> | [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2004/1791.pdf Becker, Weller, Gaddis et al (2004) <i>Progress in Reviving Lunar Orbiter</i>i]<br> | ||
[http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/LunarOrbiterDigitization/ Lunar Orbiter Digitization Project]</p> | [http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/LunarOrbiterDigitization/ Lunar Orbiter Digitization Project]</p> | ||
| − | <p | + | <p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[February 12, 2004|Happy Birthday, Darwin]] </p> |
| + | <p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[February 14, 2004|Happy Valentine Dome Day!]] </p> | ||
</td></tr> | </td></tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
| Line 53: | Line 55: | ||
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author & Editor:</b><br> | <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author & Editor:</b><br> | ||
[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Charles A. Wood]</p> | [mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Charles A. Wood]</p> | ||
| − | < | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> |
| − | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | |
| − | < | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> |
| − | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | |
| − | < | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> |
| − | + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | |
| + | <!-- Cleanup of credits --> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
| − | ---- | + | <!-- End of content --> |
| − | + | {{wiki/ArticleFooter}} | |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 18:11, 7 February 2015
Copernicus in Color
 |
Image Credit: Lisa Gaddis |
|
Copernicus in Color Robotic spacecraft have made two major contributions to lunar imaging. From the mid-1960s thru the early 1970s, high resolution images were obtained by Lunar Orbiter and Apollo spacecraft - this is still the highest resolution coverage available for the Moon. During the 1990s, global multi-spectral coverage was acquired by Galileo, Clementine and Lunar Prospector. Now, these two types of data are finally being combined. The slowdown stems from the fact that the early high resolution images were not digital. But during the last few years the US Geological Survey in Flagstaff, AZ has been digitizing Lunar Orbiter images. One dramatic example of the value of getting all the data digital is illustrated here. The image on the right is the somewhat standard Clementine color composite made with three wavelengths of Copernicus. In general, red colored areas are glass-rich impact melt, and blue is highland (anorthositic) materials. Co-registration of this Clementine spectral image with the USGS digitized Lunar Orbiter IV image results in a topographically and geologically much more interpretable image (left). For example, the red triangle of impact melt on the floor is bounded by the edge of Copernicus' wall. Comparison with higher resolution Orbiter frames shows that the impact melt zone exactly matches the smooth surface area of the floor of Copernicus, where the melt drapes over underlying terrain. The fact that the impact melt doesn't occur uniformly around Copernicus leads to speculation that Copernicus may have resulted from an oblique impact with the projectile coming from the south, southeast. And melt on the floor suggest volcanism has not been important! Technical Details: Related Links: Yesterday's LPOD: Happy Birthday, Darwin Tomorrow's LPOD: Happy Valentine Dome Day! |
|
Author & Editor: |
COMMENTS?
Register, Log in, and join in the comments.
