Difference between revisions of "January 27, 2011"
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=Micro Features= | =Micro Features= | ||
| + | <!-- Start of content --> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:<h1> --> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:<h1> --> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Jan27-11.jpg/196383852/LPOD-Jan27-11.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Jan27-11.jpg|LPOD-Jan27-11.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br /> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Jan27-11.jpg/196383852/LPOD-Jan27-11.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Jan27-11.jpg|LPOD-Jan27-11.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br /> | ||
<em>north to the left LRO-WAC image processed by [mailto:BrendanShaw@btinternet.com Brendan Shaw]</em><br /> | <em>north to the left LRO-WAC image processed by [mailto:BrendanShaw@btinternet.com Brendan Shaw]</em><br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| − | Brendan processed LRO WAC images showing this area of Mare Imbrium just north of Helicon and LeVerrier. | + | Brendan processed LRO WAC images showing this area of Mare Imbrium just north of Helicon and LeVerrier. |
| − | There are a number of interesting small features to explore here, but first notice the broad scale difference in | + | There are a number of interesting small features to explore here, but first notice the broad scale difference in |
| − | surface smoothness. In the annotated image below a horizontal line is the boundary between rough textured | + | surface smoothness. In the annotated image below a horizontal line is the boundary between rough textured |
| − | lava and a smoother surface below the line. Because this boundary is so straight it is probably a difference in | + | lava and a smoother surface below the line. Because this boundary is so straight it is probably a difference in |
| − | processing of the LRO image, but there do seem to be fewer craters below the line. If it is real it is the edge | + | processing of the LRO image, but there do seem to be fewer craters below the line. If it is real it is the edge |
| − | between a younger lava unit and an older, rougher surface one. Nearly all of the interesting features here are | + | between a younger lava unit and an older, rougher surface one. Nearly all of the interesting features here are |
| − | above the line. For example, Brendan circled two objects. To the left is a crater that doesn't look like the | + | above the line. For example, Brendan circled two objects. To the left is a crater that doesn't look like the |
| − | normal impact craters. It has a very low rim and a shallow interior. Probably it is a normal impact crater that | + | normal impact craters. It has a very low rim and a shallow interior. Probably it is a normal impact crater that |
| − | was overwhelmed by lava flows. The second circle on the right marks a more peculiar feature. It is circular | + | was overwhelmed by lava flows. The second circle on the right marks a more peculiar feature. It is circular |
| − | with pit in its center - it looks like a squashed dome, or a Cheerio encrusted with lava. It also is similar to the | + | with pit in its center - it looks like a squashed dome, or a Cheerio encrusted with lava. It also is similar to the |
| − | oddity discussed [[January_14,_2011|recently]]. It must be some sort of volcanic structure. Next topic. Do you notice the rimless | + | oddity discussed [[January_14,_2011|recently]]. It must be some sort of volcanic structure. Next topic. Do you notice the rimless |
| − | craters scattered across the image? There is one to the left of each "R" on the image below. These could be | + | craters scattered across the image? There is one to the left of each "R" on the image below. These could be |
| − | collapse pits, as occur over voids created by buried lava tubes that drain their lava. Or they could be normal | + | collapse pits, as occur over voids created by buried lava tubes that drain their lava. Or they could be normal |
| − | impact craters that have been surrounded by later lavas that buried their bases and didn't quite overflow their | + | impact craters that have been surrounded by later lavas that buried their bases and didn't quite overflow their |
| − | rims. The latter interpretation makes sense for a few, but I see at least six here. But Brendan's circled crater | + | rims. The latter interpretation makes sense for a few, but I see at least six here. But Brendan's circled crater |
| − | could simply be the largest of such flooded craters.. The flooded craters labeled 3 are examples of lava flow | + | could simply be the largest of such flooded craters.. The flooded craters labeled 3 are examples of lava flow |
| − | interactions with existing craters. So there is evidence for both of the interpretations. Finally, number "1" on | + | interactions with existing craters. So there is evidence for both of the interpretations. Finally, number "1" on |
| − | the image below indicates a short segment of a rille. Look closely at the area above the circle and you will | + | the image below indicates a short segment of a rille. Look closely at the area above the circle and you will |
| − | notice a very low ridge that continues the direction of the rille. This could be a surface expression of the | + | notice a very low ridge that continues the direction of the rille. This could be a surface expression of the |
| − | uncollapsed portion of the lava tube. I suppose that any piece of a mare looked at closely will show similar | + | uncollapsed portion of the lava tube. I suppose that any piece of a mare looked at closely will show similar |
| − | bits of its history. | + | bits of its history. |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | <em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | <strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | ||
| − | Rükl plate [ | + | Rükl plate [https://the-moon.us/wiki/R%C3%BCkl_10 10]<br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| + | <hr /> | ||
<p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[January 26, 2011|The Moon is a Balloon]] </p> | <p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[January 26, 2011|The Moon is a Balloon]] </p> | ||
<p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[January 28, 2011|Mega-Megadomes]] </p> | <p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[January 28, 2011|Mega-Megadomes]] </p> | ||
| − | < | + | <!-- End of content --> |
| + | {{wiki/ArticleFooter}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:48, 13 October 2018
Micro Features
north to the left LRO-WAC image processed by Brendan Shaw
Brendan processed LRO WAC images showing this area of Mare Imbrium just north of Helicon and LeVerrier.
There are a number of interesting small features to explore here, but first notice the broad scale difference in
surface smoothness. In the annotated image below a horizontal line is the boundary between rough textured
lava and a smoother surface below the line. Because this boundary is so straight it is probably a difference in
processing of the LRO image, but there do seem to be fewer craters below the line. If it is real it is the edge
between a younger lava unit and an older, rougher surface one. Nearly all of the interesting features here are
above the line. For example, Brendan circled two objects. To the left is a crater that doesn't look like the
normal impact craters. It has a very low rim and a shallow interior. Probably it is a normal impact crater that
was overwhelmed by lava flows. The second circle on the right marks a more peculiar feature. It is circular
with pit in its center - it looks like a squashed dome, or a Cheerio encrusted with lava. It also is similar to the
oddity discussed recently. It must be some sort of volcanic structure. Next topic. Do you notice the rimless
craters scattered across the image? There is one to the left of each "R" on the image below. These could be
collapse pits, as occur over voids created by buried lava tubes that drain their lava. Or they could be normal
impact craters that have been surrounded by later lavas that buried their bases and didn't quite overflow their
rims. The latter interpretation makes sense for a few, but I see at least six here. But Brendan's circled crater
could simply be the largest of such flooded craters.. The flooded craters labeled 3 are examples of lava flow
interactions with existing craters. So there is evidence for both of the interpretations. Finally, number "1" on
the image below indicates a short segment of a rille. Look closely at the area above the circle and you will
notice a very low ridge that continues the direction of the rille. This could be a surface expression of the
uncollapsed portion of the lava tube. I suppose that any piece of a mare looked at closely will show similar
bits of its history.
Chuck Wood
Related Links
Rükl plate 10
Yesterday's LPOD: The Moon is a Balloon
Tomorrow's LPOD: Mega-Megadomes
COMMENTS?
Register, Log in, and join in the comments.
