Difference between revisions of "February 1, 2011"
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=Green, but not Cheese= | =Green, but not Cheese= | ||
| − | + | <!-- Start of content --> | |
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:<h1> --> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:<h1> --> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Feb1-11.jpg/197636186/LPOD-Feb1-11.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Feb1-11.jpg|LPOD-Feb1-11.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br /> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Feb1-11.jpg/197636186/LPOD-Feb1-11.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Feb1-11.jpg|LPOD-Feb1-11.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br /> | ||
<em>south up image by [mailto:michael_hunnekuhl@web.de Michael Hunnekuhl], Hannover Germany</em><br /> | <em>south up image by [mailto:michael_hunnekuhl@web.de Michael Hunnekuhl], Hannover Germany</em><br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| − | Michael's false color images are revealing but I'm not quite sure what they are telling us. | + | Michael's false color images are revealing but I'm not quite sure what they are telling us. |
| − | I have enhanced this image considerably beyond the more natural colors that Michael | + | I have enhanced this image considerably beyond the more natural colors that Michael |
| − | originally showed. Here the color is mostly a military brown, with bright spots around | + | originally showed. Here the color is mostly a military brown, with bright spots around |
| − | fresh impact craters, including the odd bluish one near Descartes (upper right). But | + | fresh impact craters, including the odd bluish one near Descartes (upper right). But |
| − | looking closer there are patches that are reddish, yellowish and some even with hints of | + | looking closer there are patches that are reddish, yellowish and some even with hints of |
| − | green. All of these hues are visible on the floor and rim of Albategnius at upper left. The | + | green. All of these hues are visible on the floor and rim of Albategnius at upper left. The |
| − | first thing to ask is if these subtle hues are real or artifacts of my extreme processing. | + | first thing to ask is if these subtle hues are real or artifacts of my extreme processing. |
| − | One way to tell is to compare this with other color enhanced images, but I don't have any | + | One way to tell is to compare this with other color enhanced images, but I don't have any |
| − | right now. Assuming this are mostly real leads to the question of what causes them. The | + | right now. Assuming this are mostly real leads to the question of what causes them. The |
| − | spottiness of the reds suggest they are not a single continuous geologic unit, like lava | + | spottiness of the reds suggest they are not a single continuous geologic unit, like lava |
| − | flows in the maria, but may be caused by a spotty process, for example, splashes of | + | flows in the maria, but may be caused by a spotty process, for example, splashes of |
| − | material associated with secondary craters. But the spottiness seems more uniform than | + | material associated with secondary craters. But the spottiness seems more uniform than |
| − | secondaries should be so I am left uncertain. The green on the floor of [ | + | secondaries should be so I am left uncertain. The green on the floor of [https://the-moon.us/wiki/Argelander Argelander] is |
| − | more geologically constrained and thus looks more likely to be real. It will be intriguing | + | more geologically constrained and thus looks more likely to be real. It will be intriguing |
| − | to see if some future, more rigorous analysis recognizes a different composition for the | + | to see if some future, more rigorous analysis recognizes a different composition for the |
| − | floor of Argelander. What do you think? | + | floor of Argelander. What do you think? |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | <em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | <strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | ||
| − | Rükl plate [ | + | Rükl plate [https://the-moon.us/wiki/R%C3%BCkl_56 56]<br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<hr /> | <hr /> | ||
| + | <p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[January 31, 2011|Trough Musings]] </p> | ||
| + | <p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[February 2, 2011|The Classics]] </p> | ||
| + | <!-- End of content --> | ||
| + | {{wiki/ArticleFooter}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:45, 13 October 2018
Green, but not Cheese
south up image by Michael Hunnekuhl, Hannover Germany
Michael's false color images are revealing but I'm not quite sure what they are telling us.
I have enhanced this image considerably beyond the more natural colors that Michael
originally showed. Here the color is mostly a military brown, with bright spots around
fresh impact craters, including the odd bluish one near Descartes (upper right). But
looking closer there are patches that are reddish, yellowish and some even with hints of
green. All of these hues are visible on the floor and rim of Albategnius at upper left. The
first thing to ask is if these subtle hues are real or artifacts of my extreme processing.
One way to tell is to compare this with other color enhanced images, but I don't have any
right now. Assuming this are mostly real leads to the question of what causes them. The
spottiness of the reds suggest they are not a single continuous geologic unit, like lava
flows in the maria, but may be caused by a spotty process, for example, splashes of
material associated with secondary craters. But the spottiness seems more uniform than
secondaries should be so I am left uncertain. The green on the floor of Argelander is
more geologically constrained and thus looks more likely to be real. It will be intriguing
to see if some future, more rigorous analysis recognizes a different composition for the
floor of Argelander. What do you think?
Chuck Wood
Technical Details
- 04/22/2010 23:00 MEZ. Luminance: Lichtenknecker Fraunhofer Refraktor 3000 / 200,
DMK 31AF03.AS. Luminance: Lichtenknecker Fraunhofer Refractor f=3000mm /D= 200
mm, DMK 31AF03.AS + Baader Planetarium G-CCD filter. Color: C11 + Canon 40D.
Data processing: AVI Stack, Fitswork and Photoshop.
Related Links
Rükl plate 56
Yesterday's LPOD: Trough Musings
Tomorrow's LPOD: The Classics
COMMENTS?
Register, Log in, and join in the comments.
