Difference between revisions of "May 8, 2005"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=Splayed Rays=
 
=Splayed Rays=
 +
<!-- Start of content -->
 
<table width="85%"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2">
 
<table width="85%"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2">
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td width="50%"><h2><nobr>Splayed Rays</nobr></h2></td>
 
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
 
<table width="85%"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2">
 
<table width="85%"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2">
 
<tr><td colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center">
 
<tr><td colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center">
<img src="archive/2005/05/images/LPOD-2005-05-08.jpeg" border="0">
+
[[File:LPOD-2005-05-08.jpeg|LPOD-2005-05-08.jpeg]]
 
</div></td>
 
</div></td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
 
<table width="80%"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
 
<table width="80%"  border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8">
<tr><td><div align="center" class="main_sm">Image Credit: [mailto:Behaegel@pandora.be Christophe Behaegel]</p>
+
<tr><td><div align="center" class="main_sm"><p>Image Credit: [mailto:Behaegel@pandora.be Christophe Behaegel]</p>
 
</div></td>
 
</div></td>
 
</tr>   
 
</tr>   
Line 21: Line 21:
 
<p align="center"><b>Splayed Rays</b></p>
 
<p align="center"><b>Splayed Rays</b></p>
 
<p align="left">Did you ever put a magnet under a sheet of paper and sprinkle iron fillings on top? Did you ever do it with three magnets? If so you’d get something similar to this high sun view of rays splaying out from Copernicus (top right), Kepler (lower center) and Aristarchus (middle left). The rays radiate in all directions, and some seem to connect the three craters into a giant triangle. This image shows the variations in the nature of rays, even at a single crater. Rays are perhaps the most difficult type of lunar features to classify, and no classification scheme is commonly used to describe their shapes. Most of the rays from these three craters are relatively narrow but some are much wider. Copernicus has narrow, wispy rays extending in all directions, and wide, semi-parallel rays leading towards Aristarchus and crossing Imbrium. Kepler’s rays are mostly thin and non-distinct to the east, but there are four broad rays to the west, with sharp boundaries with the maria. Aristarchus’ rays are the least conspicuous of the three, and are most visible to its east. All three craters are surrounded by broad annular regions about 1-2 crater diameters wide. This is equivalent to the bright nimbus often seen around tiny fresh craters at full Moon. Curiously, there is not a modern catalog of rayed craters; one must go back to the classical moon mappers such as Schmidt and [http://cwm.lpod.org/DataStuff/rays.htm Elger] to find a thorough listing.</p>
 
<p align="left">Did you ever put a magnet under a sheet of paper and sprinkle iron fillings on top? Did you ever do it with three magnets? If so you’d get something similar to this high sun view of rays splaying out from Copernicus (top right), Kepler (lower center) and Aristarchus (middle left). The rays radiate in all directions, and some seem to connect the three craters into a giant triangle. This image shows the variations in the nature of rays, even at a single crater. Rays are perhaps the most difficult type of lunar features to classify, and no classification scheme is commonly used to describe their shapes. Most of the rays from these three craters are relatively narrow but some are much wider. Copernicus has narrow, wispy rays extending in all directions, and wide, semi-parallel rays leading towards Aristarchus and crossing Imbrium. Kepler’s rays are mostly thin and non-distinct to the east, but there are four broad rays to the west, with sharp boundaries with the maria. Aristarchus’ rays are the least conspicuous of the three, and are most visible to its east. All three craters are surrounded by broad annular regions about 1-2 crater diameters wide. This is equivalent to the bright nimbus often seen around tiny fresh craters at full Moon. Curiously, there is not a modern catalog of rayed craters; one must go back to the classical moon mappers such as Schmidt and [http://cwm.lpod.org/DataStuff/rays.htm Elger] to find a thorough listing.</p>
<blockquote><p align="right">&#8212; [mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</blockquote>
+
<blockquote>
<p align="left"><p><b>Related Links:</b><br>
+
<p align="right">&#8212; [mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</p></blockquote>
 +
<p align="left"><b>Related Links:</b><br>
 
[http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Sept04/LunarRays.html Lunar Crater Rays]
 
[http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Sept04/LunarRays.html Lunar Crater Rays]
<p align="left"><b>Tomorrow's LPOD: </b> The Source of Lunar Nomenclature</p>
+
</p>
 +
<p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[May 7, 2005|Buried and Textured]] </p>
 +
<p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[May 9, 2005|NOT the Source of Lunar Nomenclature]] </p>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
Line 35: Line 38:
 
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author &amp; Editor:</b><br>  
 
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author &amp; Editor:</b><br>  
 
[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Charles A. Wood]</p>
 
[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Charles A. Wood]</p>
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Technical Consultant:</b><br>
+
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
[mailto:anthony@perseus.gr Anthony Ayiomamitis]</p>
+
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Contact Translator:</b><br>
+
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
[mailto:pablolonnie@yahoo.com.mx" class="one Pablo Lonnie Pacheco Railey]  (Es)<br>
+
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
[mailto:chlegrand@free.fr" class="one Christian Legrand] (Fr)</p>
+
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>[mailto:webuser@observingthesky.org Contact Webmaster]</b></p>
+
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>A service of:</b><br>
+
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
[http://www.observingthesky.org/" class="one ObservingTheSky.Org]</p>
+
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Visit these other PODs:</b> <br>
+
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
[http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html" class="one Astronomy] | [http://www.msss.com/" class="one Mars] | [http://epod.usra.edu/" class="one Earth]</p>
+
<!-- Cleanup of credits -->
 
</td></tr>
 
</td></tr>
 
</table>  
 
</table>  
 
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 
<p>&nbsp;</p>
----
+
<!-- End of content -->
===COMMENTS?===
+
{{wiki/ArticleFooter}}
Register, and click on the <b>Discussion</b> tab at the top of the page.
 

Latest revision as of 14:15, 15 March 2015

Splayed Rays

LPOD-2005-05-08.jpeg

Image Credit: Christophe Behaegel


Splayed Rays

Did you ever put a magnet under a sheet of paper and sprinkle iron fillings on top? Did you ever do it with three magnets? If so you’d get something similar to this high sun view of rays splaying out from Copernicus (top right), Kepler (lower center) and Aristarchus (middle left). The rays radiate in all directions, and some seem to connect the three craters into a giant triangle. This image shows the variations in the nature of rays, even at a single crater. Rays are perhaps the most difficult type of lunar features to classify, and no classification scheme is commonly used to describe their shapes. Most of the rays from these three craters are relatively narrow but some are much wider. Copernicus has narrow, wispy rays extending in all directions, and wide, semi-parallel rays leading towards Aristarchus and crossing Imbrium. Kepler’s rays are mostly thin and non-distinct to the east, but there are four broad rays to the west, with sharp boundaries with the maria. Aristarchus’ rays are the least conspicuous of the three, and are most visible to its east. All three craters are surrounded by broad annular regions about 1-2 crater diameters wide. This is equivalent to the bright nimbus often seen around tiny fresh craters at full Moon. Curiously, there is not a modern catalog of rayed craters; one must go back to the classical moon mappers such as Schmidt and Elger to find a thorough listing.

Chuck Wood

Related Links:
Lunar Crater Rays

Yesterday's LPOD: Buried and Textured

Tomorrow's LPOD: NOT the Source of Lunar Nomenclature



Author & Editor:
Charles A. Wood

 


COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.