Difference between revisions of "June 9, 2006"

From LPOD
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
=Interlude=
 
=Interlude=
 +
<!-- Start of content -->
 
<div class="post" id="post-324">
 
<div class="post" id="post-324">
  
Line 12: Line 13:
 
<p><b>Related Links:</b><br />
 
<p><b>Related Links:</b><br />
 
Rükl plates 14 &#038; 24<br />
 
Rükl plates 14 &#038; 24<br />
[http://www.lpod.org/archive/archive/2004/01/LPOD-2004-01-09.htm My favorite Posidonius image]</p>
+
[[January_9,_2004|My favorite Posidonius image]]</p>
<p align="center">
+
<p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[June 8, 2006|Ring the Bell]] </p>
<i>You can support LPOD when you buy ANY book from Amazon thru [http://www.lpod.org/?page_id=102  LPOD!]</i></p>
+
<p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[June 10, 2006|Criss-Crossed]] </p>
 +
<!-- Removed reference to store page 2 -->
 
</div>
 
</div>
----
+
<!-- End of content -->
===COMMENTS?===
+
{{wiki/ArticleFooter}}
Register, and click on the <b>Discussion</b> tab at the top of the page.
 

Latest revision as of 22:30, 8 February 2015

Interlude

PosidoniusDrawing.jpg

drawing by Bernard Nomblot

Imaging the Moon has become a precise art, but the art of drawing the lunar surface remains subjective and emotional - and that is a good thing. I would not trust a drawing to be an accurate depiction of details (although it might be), but I would hope a drawing would evocatively capture the feeling of an observing experience. This one by Bernard does exactly that. When we look through an eyepiece - and especially when we remember such observations - shadows are richly black and the rims catching the Sun are brilliantly white. The details we strain to see, such as the rilles in Posidonius, seem razer sharp (especially in memory) while the rest of the field of view is often schematic. The human eye, brain and hand create a representation with selective emphasis, and a drop off in detail away from the focal point, reaching a white nothingness beyond the area of interest. Pity the poor technofile, whose camera indiscriminately captures everything!

Chuck Wood

Technical Details:
5 August 2004 with an 8” sct. Bernard writes: I love this kind of slow work, because when drawing you have to look at the moon, not only seeing it. At telescope I work with intensity code: 0 for black, 10 for dazzling white; I redraw the drawing on strong paper with different pencils and china ink for the black.

Related Links:
Rükl plates 14 & 24
My favorite Posidonius image

Yesterday's LPOD: Ring the Bell

Tomorrow's LPOD: Criss-Crossed


COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.