Difference between revisions of "November 25, 2012"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=Areas of Confusion= | =Areas of Confusion= | ||
| − | |||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:<h1> --> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:<h1> --> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Nov25-12.jpg/385620000/LPOD-Nov25-12.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Nov25-12.jpg|LPOD-Nov25-12.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br /> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Nov25-12.jpg/385620000/LPOD-Nov25-12.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Nov25-12.jpg|LPOD-Nov25-12.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br /> | ||
| − | <em>image by [mailto:raffaele.barzacchi@gmail.com Raffaele Barzacchi], Italy</em><br /> | + | <em>image by [mailto:raffaele.barzacchi@gmail.com" rel="nofollow Raffaele Barzacchi], Italy</em><br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Kepler's rays would find more admirers if they were not so near the long and glorious Copernicus rays and the brighter ones from Aristarchus. <br /> | Kepler's rays would find more admirers if they were not so near the long and glorious Copernicus rays and the brighter ones from Aristarchus. <br /> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
boundary only because of a chance ribbon of lava that separates equally bright material on either side. What do you think? <br /> | boundary only because of a chance ribbon of lava that separates equally bright material on either side. What do you think? <br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| − | <em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | + | <em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow Chuck Wood]</em><br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | <strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 4 January 2015
Areas of Confusion
image by " rel="nofollow Raffaele Barzacchi, Italy
Kepler's rays would find more admirers if they were not so near the long and glorious Copernicus rays and the brighter ones from Aristarchus.
Raf's images emphasize a feature of Kepler's ejecta that I have noticed often but not thought enough about. An area extending out about 1.5 to
2 times Kepler's diameter (inner dark outline in negative image) is covered with bright ray-like material. Surrounding that is another discontin-
uously covered and not as bright annulus (larger black outline). The boundary of this area on the west is where broad swaths of Kepler's rays
seem truncated, extending only as narrow rays beyond. The inner bright zone is continuously covered by ejecta; the outer area must be discon-
tinuously draped with ejecta. An interesting thing about the outer area is that it is bounded on the west by a narrow fringe of dark lava. It is unlikely
that ejecta could effect the path of lava or be affected by it. It is possible that the outer zone of brightness is not real, that there seems to be a
boundary only because of a chance ribbon of lava that separates equally bright material on either side. What do you think?
" rel="nofollow Chuck Wood
Related Links
Rükl plate 30
21st Century Atlas chart 22.
