For four hundred years observers documented the Moon with drawings. And for the last 150 years photographs were also used to capture lunar detail. For nearly all of this time the artists could typically see smaller features in instants of steady seeing than cameras could record in their integrated exposures. Now in the last decade the invention of webcams and the selecting and stacking of hundreds of short exposure images finally doomed visual observing. What we have lost and gained are illustrated here with these independent but simultaneous depictions of the area near Plinius. Sally, an experienced observer and skilled artist, captured the essence, the feeling of this area, and Simon captured the reality. Of course, differences can not be ascribed just to differences in recording techniques since vastly different apertures were used. But there are many differences of detail. The drawing is focused on the center of the sketch, from the glacis around Plinius to the ridges in northern Mare Tranquillitatis (north to the left). The areas around the edges of the sketch are just roughed in, lacking detail that would have been seen if they had been the center of attention. And even the features near the center of the sketch are somewhat abstract, showing form more than detail. For example, the prominent small crater just north of Jansen is shown on the sketch, but not as a recognizable crater. If Sally’s drawing had been made 150 years ago, and the next observer’s drawing showed the crater, there would be excitement over the discovery of a new formation… For studies of the lunar surface Simon’s image is ideal, but for framing and hanging on the wall of my study I’d want Sally’s evocative sketch. We have the luxury of having both!
April 22, 2007.
Rükl plates 24, 25, 35 & 36
Yesterday's LPOD: A Sparkling Diamond
Tomorrow's LPOD: Polar Classic