October 19, 2015

From LPOD
Revision as of 01:04, 19 October 2015 by Api (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ =1826 Moon= Originally published October 18, 2004 <!-- Start of content --> <table width="85%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> <tr> </tr>...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

1826 Moon

Originally published October 18, 2004

LPOD-2004-10-18.jpeg

Image Credit: Chuck Wood


1826 Moon

I did it again. I bought another lunar map on eBay. This one was printed in London in 1826 and apparently was from an encyclopedia or some similar work. I hate it when books are disassembled to sell the plates - but I love the old lunar maps! The left side of the engraving contains illustrations of lunar shadows, phases and eclipses but the glory of the plate is the large full Moon drawing, shown here. In general, almost every lunar map made in the 1700s and early 1800s was a copy of one of the few original telescope-based drawing made by Hevelius or Grimaldi. But this particular drawing seems to be based on the 1805 engraving of the full Moon by the British artist John Russell (see Whitaker's Mapping and Naming of the Moon, p 99). Russell's map had more details, and the copier mimicked the general patterns but simplified. In fact, the simplification went so far that Copernicus has disappeared from the copy, even though it is clearly shown by Russell. It is ironic that this is a degraded copy of Russell's map, because Russell was inspired to make his very accurate map because of the very poor quality maps commonly reproduced in books!

Chuck Wood

Related Links:
The Artist John Russell

Yesterday's LPOD: Rounding the Ellipses

Tomorrow's LPOD: Rays of Light



Author & Editor:
Charles A. Wood

 


COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.