November 29, 2015

From LPOD
Revision as of 02:04, 29 November 2015 by Api (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ =Overlooked Secondaries= Originally published December 10, 2004 <!-- Start of content --> <table width="85%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Overlooked Secondaries

Originally published December 10, 2004

LPOD-2004-12-10.jpeg

Image Credit: Ralf Vanderbergh


Overlooked Secondaries

During the 1940s and 50s, Dinsmore Alter, the Director of Griffith Observatory, was an important expert on the Moon. Alter is most famous for his reports of obscurations in Alphonsus. His beliefs about the Moon were rather typical of the period - that is they were wrong. Alter thought that most lunar craters were volcanic calderas. Gene Shoemaker's convincing analysis that the rays of Copernicus resulted from ejecta thrown out by a powerful impact made Alter accept an impact origin for rayed craters, but not for non-rayed craters such as Eratosthenes. But, although Alter didn't know it, Eratosthenes does have faint rays, and as Ralf's image clearly illustrates, it also has secondary crater chains. It is incomprehensible that Alter did not notice that Eratosthenes is nearly identical morphologically to Copernicus and other large rayed craters. But a strongly held world-view (i.e. craters are volcanic) makes commonsense evaporate!

Chuck Wood

Technical Details:
December 4. 2004. 10 inch Newtonian and Philips ToUcam PCVC740k at 1/25 sec.

Related Links:
Rukl Atlas of the Moon, Sheet 21 & 32

Yesterday's LPOD: A Long Valley

Tomorrow's LPOD: A New (Old) Lunar Atlas



Author & Editor:
Charles A. Wood

 


COMMENTS?

Register, Log in, and join in the comments.