Difference between revisions of "October 18, 2004"
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ =1826 Moon= <table width="85%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="2"> <tr> <td width="50%"></td> </tr> </table> <table width="85%" border=...") |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<table width="80%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> | <table width="80%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="8"> | ||
− | <tr><td><div align="center" class="main_sm">Image Credit: [mailto:chuck@observingthesky.org Charles A. Wood]</p> | + | <tr><td><div align="center" class="main_sm">Image Credit: <a class="one" href="chuck@observingthesky.org">Chuck Wood</a></p> |
+ | </div></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <table class="story" border="0" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" width="90%" cellpadding="10" align="center"><tr><td> | ||
+ | <p align="center"><b>1826 Moon</b></p> | ||
+ | <p align="left">I did it again. I bought another lunar map on eBay. This one was printed in London in 1826 and apparently was from an encyclopedia or some similar work. I hate it when books are disassembled to sell the plates - but I love the old lunar maps! The left side of the engraving contains illustrations of lunar shadows, phases and eclipses but the glory of the plate is the large full Moon drawing, shown here. In general, almost every lunar map made in the 1700s and early 1800s was a copy of one of the few original telescope-based drawing made by Hevelius or Grimaldi. But this particular drawing seems to be based on the 1805 engraving of the full Moon by the British artist John Russell (see Whitaker's <i>Mapping and Naming of the Moon,</i> p 99). Russell's map had more details, and the copier mimicked the general patterns but simplified. In fact, the simplification went so far that Copernicus has disappeared from the copy, even though it is clearly shown by Russell. It is ironic that this is a degraded copy of Russell's map, because Russell was inspired to make his very accurate map because of the very poor quality maps commonly reproduced in books!</p> | ||
+ | <blockquote><p align="right">— [mailto:chuck@observingthesky.org Chuck Wood]</blockquote> | ||
+ | <p align="left"><p><b>Related Links:</b><br> | ||
+ | [http://www.getty.edu/art/collections/bio/a18318-1.html The Artist John Russell] | ||
+ | <p align="left"><b>Tomorrow's LPOD: </b> Rays of Light</p> | ||
+ | <p><img src="MainPage/spacer.gif" width="640" height="1"></p></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="4"> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><hr width="640"></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Author & Editor:</b><br> | ||
+ | [mailto:chuck@observingthesky.org Charles A. Wood]</p> | ||
<p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Technical Consultant:</b><br> | <p align="center" class="main_titles"><b>Technical Consultant:</b><br> | ||
[mailto:anthony@perseus.gr Anthony Ayiomamitis]</p> | [mailto:anthony@perseus.gr Anthony Ayiomamitis]</p> |
Revision as of 23:00, 2 January 2015
1826 Moon
<img src="archive/2004/10/images/LPOD-2004-10-18.jpeg" border="0"> |
Image Credit: <a class="one" href="chuck@observingthesky.org">Chuck Wood</a>
|
1826 Moon I did it again. I bought another lunar map on eBay. This one was printed in London in 1826 and apparently was from an encyclopedia or some similar work. I hate it when books are disassembled to sell the plates - but I love the old lunar maps! The left side of the engraving contains illustrations of lunar shadows, phases and eclipses but the glory of the plate is the large full Moon drawing, shown here. In general, almost every lunar map made in the 1700s and early 1800s was a copy of one of the few original telescope-based drawing made by Hevelius or Grimaldi. But this particular drawing seems to be based on the 1805 engraving of the full Moon by the British artist John Russell (see Whitaker's Mapping and Naming of the Moon, p 99). Russell's map had more details, and the copier mimicked the general patterns but simplified. In fact, the simplification went so far that Copernicus has disappeared from the copy, even though it is clearly shown by Russell. It is ironic that this is a degraded copy of Russell's map, because Russell was inspired to make his very accurate map because of the very poor quality maps commonly reproduced in books! Related Links: Tomorrow's LPOD: Rays of Light <img src="MainPage/spacer.gif" width="640" height="1"> |
Author & Editor: Technical Consultant: Contact Translator: A service of: Visit these other PODs: |
COMMENTS?
Click on this icon File:PostIcon.jpg at the upper right to post a comment.