Difference between revisions of "September 23, 2012"
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=Three Easy Pieces= | =Three Easy Pieces= | ||
| − | + | <!-- Start of content --> | |
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:<h1> --> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:<h1> --> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Sep23-12.jpg/366941054/LPOD-Sep23-12.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Sep23-12.jpg|LPOD-Sep23-12.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br /> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Sep23-12.jpg/366941054/LPOD-Sep23-12.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Sep23-12.jpg|LPOD-Sep23-12.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br /> | ||
<em>images by [mailto:drjosedebenito@gmail.com Jose Antonio Benito Aguilar], Madrid, Spain</em><br /> | <em>images by [mailto:drjosedebenito@gmail.com Jose Antonio Benito Aguilar], Madrid, Spain</em><br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| − | This is the way I observe the Moon. I start with a low power eyepiece that takes in the entire visible globe, looking over the entire area to see what is well positioned along the terminator and I glance around the limb to check for features exposed by good librations. And then, changing eyepiece once, twice or three times I explore individual pieces with increasing attention to details. For example, in Jose's top view of Cassini I would wonder once again about why it has a steep-edged look - is all of the material outside its rim crest its own ejecta? Also, what is the nature of the alcove that Cassini sits in? What caused the break in the Caucasus-Alpes mountain rim of the Imbrium Basin? Moving to the second piece we are confronted again by the intermingling of ejecta between Aristillus and Autolycus - the larger crater is younger but was either an oblique impact? And I can't look at this piece of the Moon without wondering exactly where the Luna 2 debris is. When will LRO scientists discover the crash point of the first human object to reach the Moon? With the terminator near this longitude it is impossible not to linger over the [ | + | This is the way I observe the Moon. I start with a low power eyepiece that takes in the entire visible globe, looking over the entire area to see what is well positioned along the terminator and I glance around the limb to check for features exposed by good librations. And then, changing eyepiece once, twice or three times I explore individual pieces with increasing attention to details. For example, in Jose's top view of Cassini I would wonder once again about why it has a steep-edged look - is all of the material outside its rim crest its own ejecta? Also, what is the nature of the alcove that Cassini sits in? What caused the break in the Caucasus-Alpes mountain rim of the Imbrium Basin? Moving to the second piece we are confronted again by the intermingling of ejecta between Aristillus and Autolycus - the larger crater is younger but was either an oblique impact? And I can't look at this piece of the Moon without wondering exactly where the Luna 2 debris is. When will LRO scientists discover the crash point of the first human object to reach the Moon? With the terminator near this longitude it is impossible not to linger over the [[May_15,_2004|Golden Triad]] of Ptolemaeus, Alphonsus and Arzachel. There are challenges within each crater. When the Sun is low can I glimpse the saucers that delicately deform the large crater's floor? At higher Sun the dark halos in Alphonsus are usually visible but the small pits at their centers and the linking rilles are always hard to see. A little easier, with the right illumination, is the thin shadow that demonstrates that the rille on the floor of Arzachel is actually a fault, with the western side being higher than the east - the LRO Path tool shows it to be 80-100 m higher.<br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | <em>[mailto:tychocrater@yahoo.com Chuck Wood]</em><br /> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | <strong>Related Links</strong><br /> | ||
| − | Rükl plates [ | + | Rükl plates [https://the-moon.us/wiki/R%C3%BCkl_12 12] and [https://the-moon.us/wiki/R%C3%BCkl_44 44]<br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| + | <p><b>Yesterday's LPOD:</b> [[September 22, 2012|Cutting Comments]] </p> | ||
| + | <p><b>Tomorrow's LPOD:</b> [[September 24, 2012|Domeland And Rilleland]] </p> | ||
<hr /> | <hr /> | ||
| + | {{wiki/ArticleFooter}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:57, 13 October 2018
Three Easy Pieces
images by Jose Antonio Benito Aguilar, Madrid, Spain
This is the way I observe the Moon. I start with a low power eyepiece that takes in the entire visible globe, looking over the entire area to see what is well positioned along the terminator and I glance around the limb to check for features exposed by good librations. And then, changing eyepiece once, twice or three times I explore individual pieces with increasing attention to details. For example, in Jose's top view of Cassini I would wonder once again about why it has a steep-edged look - is all of the material outside its rim crest its own ejecta? Also, what is the nature of the alcove that Cassini sits in? What caused the break in the Caucasus-Alpes mountain rim of the Imbrium Basin? Moving to the second piece we are confronted again by the intermingling of ejecta between Aristillus and Autolycus - the larger crater is younger but was either an oblique impact? And I can't look at this piece of the Moon without wondering exactly where the Luna 2 debris is. When will LRO scientists discover the crash point of the first human object to reach the Moon? With the terminator near this longitude it is impossible not to linger over the Golden Triad of Ptolemaeus, Alphonsus and Arzachel. There are challenges within each crater. When the Sun is low can I glimpse the saucers that delicately deform the large crater's floor? At higher Sun the dark halos in Alphonsus are usually visible but the small pits at their centers and the linking rilles are always hard to see. A little easier, with the right illumination, is the thin shadow that demonstrates that the rille on the floor of Arzachel is actually a fault, with the western side being higher than the east - the LRO Path tool shows it to be 80-100 m higher.
Chuck Wood
Technical Details
Sept 10, 2012 for the main image, various dates for the smaller ones. Celestron C11 CGEM + Canon 500 D at prime focus; closeup views with QHY5 autoguider CCD.
Related Links
Rükl plates 12 and 44
Yesterday's LPOD: Cutting Comments
Tomorrow's LPOD: Domeland And Rilleland
COMMENTS?
Register, Log in, and join in the comments.
