Difference between revisions of "September 14, 2014"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=We Never Went To the Moon?= | =We Never Went To the Moon?= | ||
| − | |||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:<h1> --> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:<h1> --> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Sep14-14.jpg/522090060/LPOD-Sep14-14.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Sep14-14.jpg|LPOD-Sep14-14.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br /> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6:<img src="/file/view/LPOD-Sep14-14.jpg/522090060/LPOD-Sep14-14.jpg" alt="" title="" /> -->[[File:LPOD-Sep14-14.jpg|LPOD-Sep14-14.jpg]]<!-- ws:end:WikiTextLocalImageRule:6 --><br /> | ||
| − | <em>Apollo 15 image from LRO [http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-15.html#.VBTvB0vP4ZE (NASA Goddard/Arizona State University)]. Lunar Rover Vehicle and its tracks </em><br /> | + | <em>Apollo 15 image from LRO [http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-15.html#.VBTvB0vP4ZE" rel="nofollow (NASA Goddard/Arizona State University)]. Lunar Rover Vehicle and its tracks </em><br /> |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
It is indisputable, to any rational person, that we went to the Moon. But read this account from an LPOD contributor: <br /> | It is indisputable, to any rational person, that we went to the Moon. But read this account from an LPOD contributor: <br /> | ||
Revision as of 22:04, 4 January 2015
We Never Went To the Moon?
Apollo 15 image from LRO " rel="nofollow (NASA Goddard/Arizona State University). Lunar Rover Vehicle and its tracks
It is indisputable, to any rational person, that we went to the Moon. But read this account from an LPOD contributor:
I write to share a recent surprising, and to some extent rough, experience I had giving a talk about the race to the Moon to a community audience. I made my best effort to illustrate all programs involved (Vostok, Mercury, Gemini, Ranger and so on) so as to give a clear timeline of this enormous effort. What surprised me was that the questions at the end of the talk where not questions at all, but accusations about the NASA hoax: fake photos, deleted fragments of communications, lunar bases sights, even a near miss of an Apollo and a soviet craft on lunar orbit! I know the arguments to counteract these silly beliefs but the people who emit them are not interested in scientific facts; their beliefs are dogmas that admit no discussion (dialogue of the deaf). So I would greatly appreciate your advice on how to respond to this sort of ignorant questioning.
Wow. Do LPOD readers have suggestions?
